Registered user login:

Speed dating by colour

Aditi Charanji

Published 19 February 2008

Aditi Charanji goes to a singles night for British Asians and finds how people divide themselves by their religions

It was a belated Valentine's Day party for young British South Asians and it promised to bring a community together for a night of fun.

Expectations were high as we waited to get in – queueing up has never been this enjoyable and it came through in the self-deprecating banter.

“I'm amazed there isn't a terrorist alert in the area,” quipped one humorist; “It's past eight, why aren't the doors open? Oh, wait, it's an Asian event," joked another.

A white journalist walked to the door and there were hoots: “Are you tonight's entertainment?” a call went out from a young man amused that, for a change, Asians were the ethnic majority.

Waiting, one got a sense of a united community, comfortable enough to laugh at they way they're stereotyped.

But on entering the party, it was a different story. At the door was a table with ribbons, colour-coded according to religion – orange for Sikhs, red for Hindus and green for Muslims. And at the back of the venue was a corner for speed-dating, also divided into three sections on the basis of religion.

Squinting in the darkened room, people walked around looking for ribbons matching their own. Once found, conversation ensued. As a result, throughout the evening reds spoke to reds, oranges to oranges and greens to greens.

One woman who wasn't wearing a ribbon was repeatedly asked about her religious affiliation. If her answer wasn't the 'right' one, men moved away. After this happened five or six times, she turned to me and asked crossly, “Have you ever heard such a chat up line?”

“It's appalling,” said a young Hindu woman who did not wish to be named. “We are all here for an evening of fun and these coloured tags are so blatantly divisive – I've only spoken to Hindu people tonight”. Jag Singh, a Sikh man, agreed with her and added: “You'd think there'd at least be a little subtlety about it, but these tags are completely over the top."

The fact that there is no homogenous South Asian community in Britain is not news. Indeed, a substantial amount of research has gone into how British Asians are internally divided, forming their own micro-communities on the basis of country (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi), language (Gujarati, Punjabi, Hindi, Bengali etc), and religion (Hindu, Sikh, Muslim).

But if this party was any indicator, it seems as if religion has come to be the dominant basis for these divisions. As one of the organisers said: "We've got the tags colour-coded because a lot of people have complained to us about how they don't want to speak to people of other religions, and we find that [these tags] are the best way to make things clear."

The South Asia Solidarity Group (SASG) is a campaigning organisation that works towards building a united South Asian community in Britain. The SASG's biggest challenge is the increasing religious divide within the British Asian community.

Dr Kalpana Wilson, a member of SASG, says that this has to be understood in political terms, rather than in religious or cultural terms. She says that there are South Asian and British political groups that claim to represent communities, but in effect actively promote these divisions.

"New Labour has clearly encouraged people to identify increasingly with so-called 'faith communities', through funding etc. This is a continuation of the British state's long-term policies of creating divisions wherever possible ... there's speed-dating in Bombay, too, but it's not colour-coded,” she adds.

Religious divides have become so internalised that a sizeable number of people at the party thought that colour-coded tags were a great idea. “It's all very well having friends from other religions,” said Sonia, a Sikh woman from Leicester. “But when it comes to relationships or marriage, it's got to be with someone from the same background. And let's face it – this is a singles party with only one outcome in mind”. Another woman, Shazia Malik, said: “We're all Asians, but we're all different. So while we can be at a party together, we should be able to choose who to speak to”. Did she enjoy the night? “Yes, but there were not enough Muslim men – so I didn't see any prospects”.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Piers983
19 February 2008 at 16:43

Isn't it strange? There seemed to me to have been two types of division here: the first was on a purely practical (marriage) front, which the 'ordinary people' (i.e. the people at the event) ahered to; the second seems to be the (more devisive) segregation of cultures/ faith groups (segregation is probably too strong a word, but I can think of no other) that is being promoted, actively or otherwise, by political groups, events such as this and which seems to be crop up on a community scale, leading to the cultural ghettos we are so familiar with.

The ordinary people, when mixed together, had no problem integrating with one another, even though the prospect of marriage with someone from another faith was rejected. But these same people may well be members of the very community groups that lead to cultural segregation.

How we behave as individuals and how we behave as groups seem to be very different. There is nothing new in this, of course, and is as true of Westerners abroad as it is of ethnic minorities in Britain (ex-pat colonies in Spain or France, for example). Unfortunately, however, this kind of isolation always seems to bring conflict.

Perhaps, however, the 'host country' also has some responsibility in this however. We Brits (and the same abroad) are too concerned over our 'national identity' to encourage TOO much integration to take place. We look for differences in order to establish ourselves as being a distinct (and perhaps, we think, 'better') nation...

Just some thoughts :)

mikep1213
20 February 2008 at 10:16

My partner comes from a Hindu family and I am, I guess, what you'd call "white". Her parents are very devout but have no problem with me. But when I asked them what would have happened if I had been Sikh or Muslim they said they would be very concerned.

There's very little "South Asian Solidarity" to speak of in Britain. Even within faith and langauge groups there is still caste discrimination. I know of high caste Panjabi families who speak pretty disparigingly of lower caste fellow Panjabis.

My partner on the other hand completely ignores the label "South Asian". She says she's English born and English bred which is exactly what she is.

I pity the poor fool who asks at a dinner party, "No, but where do you really come from?" - the steely glance they get is terrifying!

radius
24 February 2008 at 13:40

It's sad, this atomization in the name of community, it has become a zeitgeist, officially respected and instutionally promulgated. Alternative organisation must be possible.

Killfacer
27 February 2008 at 13:20

This is disgraceful. Hardly going to help intergration if people are unwilling to speed-date those of another religion. Its blatently divisive and im sickened by it.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Are women equal now?

Win Manu Chao
Albums!

Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

Enter online