Registered user login:

Will you marry me - temporarily?

Ziauddin Sardar

Published 07 February 2008

This year, the Iranian interior ministry has launched a huge campaign to encourage the country's frustrated youth to seek sexual fulfilment in muta marriages

If the US Greeting Card Association is to be believed, more than a billion valentines will be flying across the globe this year. Mine - yes, I do get them - usually end up in our recycling bin. I take them seriously only if they come from Iran. A valentine card from the "Islamic Republic" is much more than a shot from Cupid's bow. It's the real thing: an invitation to a temporary marriage.

A temporary marriage, known generally as muta, is a specifically Shia tradition. It involves a contract between a man, who may or may not be married, and an unmarried woman - a contract in which the duration of marriage and the dowry are specified in advance. Both sides agree by mutual consent to the length of the marriage, which can range from an hour to 99 years.

There is no divorce; the muta contract simply expires with the lapse of its duration. Although witnesses are not required, the marriage has to be registered in court. Unlike in an ordinary, permanent marriage (how many really are permanent?), a temporary wife cannot claim maintenance. But a temporary husband cannot disown the children born from a muta marriage. Children of temporary marriages are considered legitimate, and are entitled to equal status in inheritance and other rights with their half- siblings born of permanent marriages.

This type of marriage existed in the time of the Prophet Muhammad, but it was banned by Umar, the second caliph, and later abandoned by most schools of Islamic law. However, "Twel ver" Shias, who predominate in Iran and Iraq, disagree with the rest of the Muslim world. They argue that it is not only a legitimate institution sanctioned by Islamic law, but essential for a society's sexual health. Since the "Islamic Revolution" of 1979, the Iranian regime has promoted muta vigorously, extolling its virtues in mosques and schools, at religious gatherings, in news papers and on radio and television.

On the whole, critics look down on the idea of temporary marriage. Sunni Muslims of my ilk see it as "impulsive sex", not too far removed from adultery and "fornication". And western critics, particularly feminists, equate muta with prostitution. I disagree. Indeed, I think these attitudes reflect our hypocrisy about sexual issues.

Muta, which means pleasure, is Iran's way of catching up with western sexual mores. The average person in the west goes through scores of temporary boyfriends and girlfriends before settling down with a single, permanent partner. That, I would argue, is little more than temporary marriage. Indeed, if it was a proper muta marriage it would save oceans of tears and heartache.

Our celebs could make everyone's lives that much easier if they took muta marriage seriously. If they marched their newest acquisition to the nearest mullah court, we would know exactly how long the latest affair would last. Moreover, we would be assured that any fruit of this tem porary union would be looked after by the man responsible and would not be a burden on the woman when she was ditched in favour of another, usually even younger, model - thus sparing us any acrimonious future lawsuits and embarrassing DNA tests.

There is, of course, always a chance that a temporary marriage turns into a permanent one. As Shahla Haeri revealed in her 1989 book, Law of Desire (published in the UK by I B Tauris), many muta contracts in Iran are transformed into permanent, loving relationships. Contrary to popular myth, it is usually not men but women, particularly divorcees and widows, who seek muta marriage. Haeri's extensive survey showed that many older women approached "young men, particularly handsome ones, directly and frequently". I think that where Iranian women lead, western women should follow.

As far as Iranian men are concerned, temporary marriage has been largely the preserve of the mullahs. This is why those seeking muta marriages have tended to go straight to Qom and Mashad, two popular and important religious centres in Iran, where eager religious scholars can be seen wandering the streets, muta contracts in hand, enticing visiting women to sign them. However, this mullah monopoly, I am glad to report, is about to be shattered.

This year, the Iranian interior ministry has launched a huge campaign to encourage the country's frustrated youth to seek sexual fulfilment in muta marriages. Roughly half of Iran's 70 million folk are under the age of 30. An increasing number are delaying marriage because of financial pressures and house prices, thereby missing out on sex. Soon, these young people will become serially monogamous, hopping from temporary partner to temporary partner. Iran will have caught up with the west; and we will all be happy.

Meanwhile, if you get a valentine card from Iran this year, don't bin it. Take it seriously. And if you are not fortunate enough to get one, get a muta partner anyway.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

9 comments from readers

malaysian sister
11 February 2008 at 05:26

Why is this knowledge not made known to all Muslims? In our community, mut`a is almost always treated as a four letter word...ha...ha. Alas, it is too late for me to indulge in mut`a. I've been happily married for 20 years. And in my circle, men and women keep themselves chaste for marriage. Very entertaining article Bro. Zia.

panda
12 February 2008 at 01:07

I think Muta is for sex seeking people who don't believe in love or not capable/ready to experience it. and don't misuse the words because what you call it Muta In Western culture they call it "Friends for benefits", which is not comparable with boyfriend-girlfriends relationships that you mentioned. I think you better draw a clear line between sex-relationships and love-relationships each has it's own members.

I won't be happy see Iran to spread Muta just for the sake of catching up with western culture. In Iran we caught up with western world technological-wise for example we have Ipods, Internet and almost everything that western world has but honestly we don't use this technologies in it's right way.

asadur123
20 February 2008 at 13:58

"Iran will have caught up with the west; and we will all be happy."

Is the promiscuity in the west an advancement in civilisation? I think not.

iliya
22 February 2008 at 15:40

Panda, muta just opens a way to have a legal and recorded (like a permanent marriage) relationship with whom you are in love or in sex. Then, it depends only on you how to initiate your relationship.

In Western, non-religious people are in favor of open relationships, in Iran too. But, in Iran, religious people also allow to benefit from some kind of open relationship without any feeling of sin.

No doubt, this larger freedom might be also abused by some people, the same as any other type of freedom in any other place of the world.

Fariborz
26 February 2008 at 05:04

I guess you missed the most important problem here. Anything Islamic Muta (temporary marriage) contract or Islamic permanent marriage contract is legal if a mullah endorses that contract. So they make mullahs indispensable for basic needs like sex. I don’t see any necessity for mullahs or any Islamic figure in life including basic needs such as sex so any contract that mullah’s endorsement is obligatory won’t last long.

And about Iran's frustrated youth I should say they didn’t frustrate over a night, they frustrated over a three decade Islamic fanatic rulings which for instance have prohibited music, dance, any sort of happiness, any sort of relationship between sexes such as simple friendships and have initiated sex segregations in all aspect of life from elementary schools, universities to government jobs and it is going on in three decades.

So how on the earth do you think involvement of government in our private life is a good thing? No way that you can justify this. Remember, nobody should seek permission from mullahs and government to fulfill his/her basic needs. I don’t know about you but I know it’s degrading to human dignity to seek permission for every basic needs.

I see Muta a form of extending Islamic rules, rulings and government to our private life which at the end of day, deprive us from our basic right as human.

Fariborz Shamshiri

www.rottengods.com

Fariborz
26 February 2008 at 07:04

p.s.

one more thing, I see Muta as a political Islam ideology and I say ff Islamist still push for political Islam which suggests Islamic teachings should be preeminent in all facets of society and Muslims must return to earlier models of Islam and practice Sharia, or Islamic law, into their society, I would say watch out, because these days nobody pay you the respect that you don't deserve anymore and your idols such as muhammad, Allah or whatever you worship and is good for you; perhaps it's good but just for you and yourself so keep it that way or it will destroy you and your ideology, altogether!

We, people, ran out of patient, here is an example www.fireonquran.com

morteza
27 February 2008 at 18:46

please translate this treatise to persian that iranians can use too. thanks

aly2k1
05 March 2008 at 01:00

http://geocities.com/aly2k1

that is the beauty of mut'ah. one can put all the conditions that are mutually agreed on and those conditions can be waived later on if mutually agreed on, including sex itself. if muslims used this institution properly it could solve a lot of the worlds problems.

True teller
23 April 2008 at 02:40

Muta'h is not an unregistered living togather or like a system of prostitution. This system covers the agreed and mutual sexual contact for physical / mental satisfication of both partner without doing sin and could go for parmanent marriage if they agree. Muta'h marriage also give grantee for bride's right over dowry, inheritance right and child care cost for their children (if any ) from male partner. There is no such grantee for female partner (in living togather), prostute or their children (from that relation). Moreover thease relationships are sinful in the eye of all religion.

True teller

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ziauddin Sardar, writer and broadcaster, describes himself as a ‘critical polymath’. He is the author of over 40 books, including the highly acclaimed ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’. He is Visiting Professor, School of Arts, the City University, London and editor of ‘Futures’, the monthly journal of planning, policy and futures studies.

Read More

Vote!

Are women equal now?

Win Manu Chao
Albums!

Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

Enter online