Registered user login:

TheFaithColumn

The Faith Column

Every week a different believer gives the inside track on their religion or philosophy.

The Faith Column Homepage

When religion means death

  • Posted by Maryam Namazie
  • 05 February 2008

Unfortunately, the discussion on what religion in power means for people’s lives, rights and freedoms is neither theoretical or restricted to ex-Muslims who have renounced Islam and religion.

Since religion is divinely ordained, it follows that any real or imputed questioning, criticising or transgressing will lead to blasphemy, apostasy or some form of ‘corruption’. Of course it doesn’t matter so much if you live in a place where religion is to a large extent a private matter. But if you don’t, then a lot of things become ‘crimes’ punishable by death.

One of many examples is the outrageous death sentence imposed by an Islamic court in Afghanistan on Parwiz Kambakhsh, the 23 year old journalist and student, for downloading and distributing an article criticising women’s status under Islam.

Many have rightly come to his defence and must keep the pressure on. But to defend Parwiz by saying he did not ‘intend’ to blaspheme misses the entire point.

This is exactly what the likes of the Muslim Council of Britain say in order to conceal the responsibility of their political Islamic movement. For example, the MCB ‘greeted’ the release of Gillian Gibbons (the British schoolteacher who was imprisoned in Sudan for allowing her 7 year old students to name their class teddy bear Mohammad) by saying she had not ‘intended to deliberately insult the Islamic faith.’

What they are basically saying is that victims and their ‘intentions’ are to blame for the injustices and barbarity of Islamic law.

Moreover, they are implying that if someone knew they were blaspheming, or if their actions or statements were so clearly blasphemous that they should have known better, then the death penalty or calls for their death are permissible - or at the very least understandable.

The smokescreen of ‘intent’ aims to conceal the real issue at hand, which is Islam in power, so their movement can go about its business as usual - often aided and abetted by US-led militarism. So it can continue to hold millions of resisting people hostage to medievalism enshrined in constitutions and legal codes and enforced by religious and morality police, the militia, Sharia courts and the state.

Any life saved is despite Islamic law and because of a vast left, secular and humanist opposition movement in the Middle East and elsewhere, which refuses to kneel.

Clearly, when religion equals power, millions have no freedoms or rights worthy of 21 century humanity.

And until it is pushed back, our loved ones - like Parwiz, or the two sisters, Zohreh and Azar, who have hours ago been convicted of death by stoning by the Islamic supreme court in Iran for ‘adultery’ - will face a torturous death.

But not if we can help it.


Join a demonstration to demand the freedom of Parwiz Kambakhsh on Friday, February 8, 2008, 12.00 to 2.00 pm at the Afghanistan Embassy, 31 Princes Gate, London, SW7 organised by the Iranian Secular Society and endorsed by the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain. You can also send letters of protest to Afghan officials by going to: http://maryamnamazie.blogspot.com/2008/01/call-for-immediate...

To defend Zohreh and Azar and oppose stoning and the death penalty, go to: http://maryamnamazie.blogspot.com/2008/02/zohreh-and-azar-mu...

Post this article to

21 comments from readers

Nada
05 February 2008 at 11:26

Erm, actually MCB was quite forthright on the Gibbons case, and we know the New Statesman will resort to anything to distort its position. MCB said the decision to arrest Gibbons was:

"A disgraceful decision and defies common sense"

http://www.mcb.org.uk/article_detail.php?article=announcemen...

And Inayat Bunglawala of MCB was a vocal critic of the Sunadese government.

Rez
05 February 2008 at 12:26

Nada

The MCB says: "There was clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult the Islamic faith"... "deliberately insult" is the key word here. It justifies persecution of those who criticize, ridicule or insult religion! I don't think they could say it any clearer than that.

http://www.mcb.org.uk/media/presstext.php?ann_id=280

Asad
05 February 2008 at 13:04

Asad

Nada should have checked her facts before accusing New Statesman of bias. The MCB website nowhere mentions that arresting Gibbons was adisgraceful decision.

In any case , Maryam Namazie's main point remains valid that people should not be sentenced because they intentionally insulted or criticised Islam.The intention is totally irreelevant

Irfan
05 February 2008 at 13:31

Dear Nada,

you state the MCB's position as '"A disgraceful decision and defies common sense" . Not so for millions of Muslim fanatics around the world who, high on Islamic laws and doctrines, don't give a damn whether a ruling is 'disgraceful' or defies common sense - all that matters is that it is in accordance with the Koran and Hadith. But for rational, humane people, the whole edifice of Islamic morality and the Sharia is disgraceful and defies common sense. I wonder what your position was regarding the Danish cartoons? I suspect you had no hesitation in condemning them outright as, in that case, there was no defence of 'intentionality'.

Abu Ali
05 February 2008 at 17:07

The US and UK should be putting pressure on Karzai and his govt to stop this - after all the lives this war has cost, it seems the fanatics are still in control.

Fariborz
05 February 2008 at 21:22

I must add that criticising religion and particularly Islam is not only a right but a necessity! When slightest enjoyment of liberty from choosing your dress to what you think about, what name you give to your child, what you listen to, what you eat and who you kiss and hold hands with, is a crime punishable sometimes by death, then it becomes even more necessary to criticise and how the roots of inequality.

Well done Maryam and thank you for your comments which allows many to see the darkest of our age!

Fariborz

Nada
06 February 2008 at 09:58

Asad: I'll happily submit to your admonition that I check my facts, but you really should open your eyes and see the my link to the MCB website where, it states that the decision was '"A disgraceful decision and defies common sense"

Rez: I'm afraid I don't see it that way. If you are going to go down that line, then perhaps you might also want to condemn our Foreign Secretary who was trying to ensure cooler heads prevail. He even went further than the MCB and (in my view wrongly) described Gibbons' teddy bear initiative an 'innocent mistake'.

link 1.

Others - No point in wasting my time, you've got your mind made up. Islam is bad full stop. Reform in Islam is unfathomable, even if you try.

But, here are a few things for you to ponder:

Assistant Sec Gen of MCB on Apostasy in Islam:

link 2

Infidel
06 February 2008 at 12:20

How do we know Inayat is practising the established Islamic process of taqqiya?

The word "al-Taqiyya" means: "Concealing or disguising one's beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and strategies at a time of eminent danger to save oneself from physical or mental injury." A one-word translation would be"Dissimulation." In Arabic the translation would be "hypocrisy in the pursuit of a greater purpose."

Afghanlord
06 February 2008 at 16:07

She is right but i am writing you from Afghanistan that please don't be worry he will be release as soon as possible. We protest against the death sentence which was imposed on him.

He will be released soon.

But there is another journalist missing look here www.afghanlord.org

or http://www.afghanlord.org/2008/01/another-journalist-who-was...

N.F

Kabul,

Afghanistan

issak
06 February 2008 at 18:01

I think this "GOD-HATING" human should'nt be allowed to write any articles on this respected and well viewed magazine. She has issues with GOD , fine but that should'nt be dealt with her but with clergy men concered whatever there religious affiliation may be.

Ophelia Benson
06 February 2008 at 18:08

Thanks for that information, Nasim. Is there any news coverage about Basir Ahang in Afghanistan?

Ophelia Benson
06 February 2008 at 18:10

Thanks for that information, Nasim. I'll see if I can find any news in English on it. Maybe Reporters Without Borders is following it. If not you should contact them, if you haven't already.

Ophelia Benson
06 February 2008 at 18:11

Ah right - 'God-hating' humans should be forbidden to write for magazines. Good thinking.

radius
06 February 2008 at 19:02

It is worth recalling Inayat's charming comment when asked about Saudi propaganda in british mosques calling for apostates to be killed: "we live in an open, democratic society where it is not illegal to sell books which contain anti-Western views". Given that Maulana Mawdudi, author of "The Punishment of the Apostate According to Islamic Law" is an MCB hero, it's hardly surprising.

The teddy bear may have been a PR opportunity not to be missed - but the MCB and MAB have consistently refused to condemn the execution of apostates and blasphemers under sharia law.

radius
06 February 2008 at 19:49

Nada, you are right about Milliband's idiotic reference to an "innocent mistake", but there is a significant difference - namely that the MCB and its major affiliates have consistently refused to condemn the punishment and killing of 'blasphemers' and 'apostates' under shari'a law. The Muslim Association of Britain is a key MCB national affiliate. In 2002 its Inspire newspaper ran a piece by Azzam Tamimi called "Islam and Human Rights" in which he identified two schools of jurisprudence on the matter of riddah: the majority one,

where the death penalty is for a religious offence; and the minority one, where the death penalty is for a political offence of treason. Inayat, in his more liberal moments, has diplomatically hinted at support for the latter legalism. A bit like the theological arguments about the prescribed means of execution (hmmm...should we stone them or burn them?) - when we kill them, do we say it's for sedition or sin?

The MCB line on killing apostates and blasphemers has always been "we can't do this under British law" - that is, it can only be done under shariah, and there's no practical prospect of introducing it in the UK. It's the same line as al-Qaradawi on gays, which seemed to please RedKen so much: we won't kill your gays and apostates (just ours). In response to an FT piece last year, Inayat said (note the careful wording): "There is simply no question of introducing Shariah law in the UK or punishing apostates." This is standard MCB phraseology: notwithstanding Inayat's studied verbal gymnastics in your CiF link, they have never come out and said that it is wrong to punish or kill apostates under Sharia law.

Greywizard
06 February 2008 at 20:07

Quite clearly, Islam in power will exercise it. If criticism of Islam is against the law of Islam (Sharia), then Islam in power will punish it. If the punishment is death, then it will execute the offender.

Muslims who do not live under Sharia can use all sorts of niceties to evade the implications of this simple equation, as the MCB does. I agree with those, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who suggests that Western countries should put a moratorium on further Muslim immigration, until this issue is settled, and we are assured that this kind of thing will not be on the agenda in the West.

This raises an important question. At the present time, Western troops are in Afghanistan monitoring an impossibly deteriorating social and policitical situation, and dying for it. Dying for a country in which journalists are sentenced to death for questioning the position of women in Islam. What are our young men fighting and dying for -- again? We are fighting for Islam's right to execute Kambakhsh for blasphemy (sorry 'blasphemy') -- is that it? Do we really think this is a worthy objective for NATO troops?

Nada
07 February 2008 at 10:20

MCB is practising Taqiyya, MCB loves Maududi, MCB advocates Shariah....

Oh boring! I know repeating untruths until it becomes true is the mantra of the New Statesman and its followers, but at least give it a semblance of respectability by providing real and actual citation.

Afghanlord
07 February 2008 at 14:06

Afghan Journalist Missing Found Safe

http://www.afghanlord.org/2008/02/journalist-missing-found-s...

radius
07 February 2008 at 21:00

Nada, what is the point in asking for citations if you've already decided these things are untruths? I have the copy of Inspire in my hands...tell me what it is you want by way of 'citation'? I'm pleased you regard "MCB loves Maududi" as a slander - but not at the assumption that somehow the MCB actually represents anyone beyond the political Islamic right. It was Maududi who inspired Bunglawala to become a 'proper' Muslim, and the UK Islamic Mission has four members on the MCB central committee, there are also people in there from the Islamic Foundation. It is hardly surprising then that the MCB has repeatedly presented Jamaat as 'mainstream' and praised Maududi as an important thinker. But then you know these things to be untruths?

Can we at least agree that the MCB are right-wing and unrepresentative...and that there is absolutely no need for you to defend them?

nawawimohamad
12 February 2008 at 03:27

Dear Maryam Namazie,

After reading through your article the only conclusion that I can make is that you are a very confused women. You are only fooling yourself.You cannot diffrentiate between what is Islamic and what is un-Islamic because you had very little knowledge on Islam and what you think you knew was infact your own perception of Islam. So please don't fool yourself.

PattyDB
13 February 2008 at 22:23

Oh, all those misinterpretations & deliberate false statements by people criticising Islam. It must be terrible seeing how all those self-appointed Islamic leaders unleashing hell where they can, got it all wrong. Because what we talk about here, all the human rights abuses and the sheer denial of dignity is what we see happening where Islam is in power. Sorry nawawimohamad, no confusion here, the facts speak for themselves.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Maryam Namazie is a rights activist, commentator and broadcaster. She is the Spokesperson of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and Equal Rights Now; National Secular Society's 2005 Secularist of the Year award winner and an NSS Honorary Associate; producer of TV International English; and Central Committee member of the Worker-communist Party of Iran. She was recently selected as Elle Magazine’s (Quebec) top 45 women of 2007.

Recent Posts

A Catholic Confirmation

  • By Andy Lewis
  • 01 May 2008

Coming of age in the Bahá’í faith

  • By Collis Tahzib
  • 30 April 2008

Coming of age as a pagan

  • By Lady SpringWolf
  • 29 April 2008

Hindu coming of age

  • By Raj Pandit Sharma
  • 28 April 2008

Generations of Seders

  • By Mordechai Wollenberg
  • 25 April 2008

The fifth son

  • By Eli Pink
  • 24 April 2008

From North London to Brighton via New Zealand

  • By Zalman Lewis
  • 23 April 2008

Designed by Wilson Fletcher