Registered user login:

The global centre of gravity shifts east

Lindsey Hilsum

Published 10 January 2008

Beijing wants to give the impression of a "harmonious society", yet the gap between rich and poor is growing

China has seen nothing like it since the Tang dynasty. That was the last time the country enjoyed rising prosperity, was courted by thousands of foreign envoys, and extended its global power. The 2008 Olympic Games are often described as China's "coming-out party", but to many it's more of a comeback, albeit one that has taken nearly 1,300 years.

Tang poetry and painting are still admired and studied, but the emblems of China's modern renaissance are architectural. The new Olympic Stadium is a "bird's nest" of titanium and glass. The nearly finished China Central Television building comprises two towers leaning into each other and joined near the top like a huge Aids ribbon, while the National Theatre - which opened in September - is a giant, golden egg laid next to Tiananmen Square. Only modern China would allow such a proliferation of experimental styles.

Under the greatest of the dynasty's emperors, Tang Xuanzong, China enjoyed 40 years of prosperity. This year, it celebrates three decades of "Reform and Opening Up", the policy that Deng Xiaoping introduced after Mao Zedong died. To say it has worked is an understatement: last year China contributed more to global growth than the US, the first time any country has done so since the 1930s. No longer is this simply a manufacturing economy - China is buying shares in big international companies, such as the Blackstone venture capital group and Morgan Stanley.

Such is China's determination to showcase its success, and so plentiful is its cash, that the budget for the Olympics is expected to reach $40bn - twice what London plans to spend in 2012. Yet its modern economy coexists with ancient beliefs: the year was chosen in part because of the auspicious date. The word ba means "eight", and its homophone (similar sound, different character) means "to prosper". The Communist Party takes its superstition seriously, so the Games will start at eight minutes past eight on the eighth day of the eighth month of the eighth year.

But numerology cannot mitigate all of China's problems. Beijing wants to give the impression of a "harmonious society", yet the gap between rich and poor is growing. With food-price inflation nudging 20 per cent, some fear protests. The heavy, grey pollution that squats like a toad over the capital has caused the president of the International Olympic Committee, Jacques Rogge, to talk of delaying the marathon.

The government's confidence seems brittle. The dissident writer Hu Jia was arrested for "subverting state authority" in late December. Hu Jia sees the problems of the poor, those affected by environmental problems and people with Aids as indivisible, and this government cannot abide anyone who joins the dots. A new decree banning all but state-owned video-sharing sites will hit those showing any anti-government footage.

No protests will be tolerated during the Games themselves. The authorities are investing millions in security cameras, ostensibly to prevent crime but also, presumably, to spot any demonstrations against official policy.

China should be able to conduct diplomacy from a position of strength, but it continues to spit and scratch like a cornered cat. Its hold on Tibet is unassailable, but relations with Germany deteriora ted after the chancellor Angela Merkel met with the Dalai Lama in September. A recent article in the China Daily ludicrously suggested that Tibet's spiritual leader was responsible for the 1995 sarin gas attack on the Tokyo Underground. Rhetoric against Taiwan is growing shrill, too, as the government in Taipei prepares for a March referendum on independence. In effect, Taiwan is a separate country, but Beijing insists that it is still a province. Only 24 small states rec ognise Taiwan, but China refuses to rest until the whole world accepts that it has sovereignty.

Historical analogies have their limits. Unlike Emperor Tang Xuanzong, President Hu Jintao will probably not lose power because of an obsession with a concubine. In 747, the emperor abolished the death penalty; today, China trumpets a decision to replace the firing squad with lethal injection. The global centre of gravity may shift east in 2008, but China's new Golden Age is not yet upon us.

Lindsey Hilsum is China correspondent for Channel 4 News

Post this article to

17 comments from readers

Carl Jones
10 January 2008 at 11:12

My comment is just about the title; its an illusion, China is unsustainable.

gnuneo
11 January 2008 at 18:25

actually, the shift is westwards, as Robert Anton Wilson noted (amongst others) decades ago.

the power shifted from London, to NY, to Texas, and now across to Beijing.

the problems that China is facing (and they are real), can easily be addressed by removing a fault in Mao's 'little red book', where he, whilst arguing for democracy, then went on to warn against "too much" democracy.

this was translated by Chinese leaders, following the lead of Mao, of limiting the control of Chinese citizens over their own lives, both political and economic.

China is currently facing a stock-market bubble caused directly by these beliefs, as the affluent classes have nowhere to invest their rapidly growing spare capital, apart from the pyramid scheme of the stock market.

yet a simple solution is obvious, once Mao's feudal edict is revoked - allow the citizens to purchase shares in the companies they work in directly.

this will not only ensure a greater spread of wealth, and maximise productivity, but will also be the base for a Chinese democratic evolution, as Chinese workers gain competence and confidence in how democracy functions.

China could also invest far more of this surplus capital in sustainable energy (and use its growing global clout and investments to do the same extra-nationally), which will also both cushion it against growing energy costs, whilst also cutting its own emissions.

put together, such measures would ensure China's continued meteoric rise, and would guarantee it a stable evolution to a liberal democracy.

the only fly in this ointment, is that the CPRC would have to curtail its own control over the economy and people, something the Chinese society has always been loath to do, following the Confucian ideals.

perhaps the time is right, for Confucian ideals to be replaced by that other great Chinese philosopher, Lao Tzu.

Carl Jones
11 January 2008 at 23:39

Yaaaaaaun. Can do better!

gnuneo
12 January 2008 at 00:00

oh dear carl, did i miss the obligatory reference to the NWO to make it into your good books?

(lol)

Carl Jones
12 January 2008 at 10:43

gnuneo, as I said, "you can do better" and you know it.

I mention the NWO a lot because its no good firing shots at specific aspects of the NWO, such as the corporations, governments, Chatham House, CFR, Freemasons, S&B, Bilderberg, City of London, Wall Street, Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank and the Rothchild family....to name a few. So its easier to use a term used by the likes of Bush senior and the present Pope.

The people who don`t like and can`t contemplate the fact that they are a willing paticipants in the evil deeds of the NWO....any MSM current affairs journalist who hasn`t called Bush and Blair a war criminal, has just as much blood on their hands as Cheney`s hired guns in Iraq. Of course, this would mean losing their jobs, suffering threats to life and limb and if you get too close in the field, the NWO forces will kill you off. Like Pearl and wounding like Frank Gardiner.

So yes, I will continue to use "NWO", because when its used in its proper context, it causes the MSM and the establishment great pain, because they are forbidden to even ackowledge the existance of the NWO. Only presidents, Popes and carefully selected members of the establishment are allowd to slip this phrase into globally reported speeches and even then, the MSM won`t report on what the NWO represents.

gnuneo
12 January 2008 at 14:07

i was not specifically critiquing your use of the term, i know full well why you use it, and i largely agree.

(i suspect my continuous pushing of capitalist partnerships is as annoying to some as your use of NWO is! ;) )

but as i have said in the past, i regard the vast majority of the worlds current political, economic and social problems to be based upon the OWO system of minority ownership of wealth generation, and China is no different.

as Amartya Sen argued in his seminal "Freedom as Development", what is holding the Chinese economy/polity back, is precisely this anti-democratic stranglehold on economic power, which feeds directly into a stranglehold upon political power - it is a fact that political power generally 'follows the money', and by switching to a modern, economic democracy, the issues facing China (ecological devastation, increasing wealth gap, totalitarian State capitalism) would, perhaps not rapidly, start to be addressed, as these problems are problems precisely because they are felt by the general population - who have little say in changing the policies that are causing them!

i do not push a Utopian ideal, for even with these reforms it is certain that Mankind will continue in its tendencies of power-politics, and other assorted stupidities, but it would however ameliorate the worst aspects of such.

although perhaps Democracy itself is a Utopian Ideal, but for that i make no apologies - it is simply and purely the best system of organisation, as evidenced by Information Theory (information flows are highest and most accurate amongst perceived equals), System Theory ditto, Political Science ditto, Development Economics ditto, even post-Jungian Psychotherapy ditto.

Also, were such an economic/political system widely implemented, it would also end Imperialism, Colonialism, Fundamentalist Christian/Islamic pretensions, and undercut the NWO at base.

If indeed China does implement such reforms, and due to this their economy continues to grow, and ultimately we all end up having to learn Chinese at school, i would still prefer that to being forced to learn Texan by our Imperial Masters, and live off a forced diet of... bananas! ;)

Peace.

:N.

Cybertiger
12 January 2008 at 18:31

@gnuneo and Jonesy

".... and ultimately we all end up having to learn Chinese at school, i would still prefer that to being forced to learn Texan by our Imperial Masters, and live off a forced diet of... bananas! ;) "

I believe the Republic of Texas grows fragrant yellow roses ... and very big bananas ... under the light of the LoneStar. Texas sells bananas and roses ... for a few dollars more .... to the Chinese democracy.

Cybertiger
12 January 2008 at 18:37

"In 747, the emperor abolished the death penalty; today, China trumpets a decision to replace the firing squad with lethal injection."

A lethal injection in California costs $250 million. In China, a bullet in the back of the head is billed to the miscreant's loved ones. I can understand why America's Golden Age has not yet arrived in China.

gnuneo
14 January 2008 at 19:04

"When shall we 3 meet again, in Pilger, Bright, - or Asylum-Insane?!?"

or are we "musketeers 3, who's sharp comments are wielded for free"?

nevermind, for tis time for tea! ;)

Harry
15 January 2008 at 13:05

"I believe the Republic of Texas grows fragrant yellow roses ... and very big bananas ... under the light of the LoneStar. Texas sells bananas and roses ... for a few dollars more .... to the Chinese democracy."

^^ Dick head not intelligent enough to have any real opinions.

Cybertiger
15 January 2008 at 14:18

"Dick head not intelligent enough ... "

I've missed you Harry - have a banana!

Cybertiger
15 January 2008 at 14:22

@Harry

PS. Why aren't you playing the Great Game just now - over in Pilgerland? Pluck a yellow rose from me - under that blessed Lone Star.

gnuneo
15 January 2008 at 14:39

and harry the hop-head closes to kill,

yet a peck is all he can achieve still.

a peck, a pick, a pickled pepper,

all he will be or achieve, per sempre.

Admin
15 January 2008 at 14:52

Could I put in a polite request that the participants in this ongoing battle of words avoid resorting to insults such as 'dickhead'. It's not pleasant and I suspect it puts others off joining in! Many thanks.

gnuneo
15 January 2008 at 17:38

LOL - Den Vaater speaks, as the insults peak!

and no more shall "dickhead" be spoken, else his ire awoken!

wherefore then shall the flying insults be turned,

respectful discussion slashed and burned?

cerebrate
01 February 2008 at 18:44

those ludicrous chinese press did have a bit of reason: Dalai Lama did openly endorse the Aum Shinrikyo, responsible to the sarin gas attack in 1995

Riaz Ahmad
09 February 2008 at 23:50

It looks like Lindsey is hell bent on lambasting China for the sake of it. She is forgetting the fact that it took Europe 150 odd Years to get to the state of economy where it is now. China was a starving country, she has done exceptionally well in two dacades. Was there not misery, inequality, poverty and privation in Britian when the country was going through the same transition. Does she not remember the witch hunt against the reformers, the sufferings of the trade union movement, the prolonged quest and fight by the working class to get the right to vote. The parliament did not come to the house of commons one sunny day and corrected all the nation's ills in one lively session. Ordinary people had to fight over a painfully long period of time to get even the basic human rights. So with what justification does she expect all to change for the good in China over night. What took many decades in the birth place of democracy, why should it happen in China over night, what is the logic behind her ill-founded and erractic criticism. China is already an economic and military super power, and it is just a matter of 30 odd years before the almighty USA will be eating the humble pie.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Lindsey Hilsum is China Correspondent for Channel 4 News. She has previously reported extensively from Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and Latin America.

Read More

Vote!

Can Gordon Brown recover from the 10p tax fiasco?

Designed by Wilson Fletcher