Registered user login:

Bright'sBlog

Bright's Blog

Politics uncovered by Martin Bright, New Statesman political editor

Bright's Blog Homepage

Unity Mitford and 'Hitler's baby'

  • Posted by Martin Bright
  • 13 December 2007

As war broke out, Hitler admirer Unity Mitford made a botched suicide attempt and was invalided home. But how come she ended up in a maternity home?

Journalists on national newspapers get used to crank calls from people claiming the government is controlling their minds using radio waves or the Duke of Edinburgh is opening their post. So when Val Hann first called me at the Observer almost exactly five years ago, I was, I have to say, extremely sceptical about what she told me.

She had read an article I had written about Unity Mitford, the 1930s society beauty who became a groupie to Adolf Hitler and shot herself in Munich at the outbreak of war. Although the bullet entered her brain, Unity survived and lived out the rest of her short life as an invalid. But my caller claimed to have an extraordinary new angle on the story.

Val was a little nervous as she explained that her aunt Betty Norton had run a maternity home to the gentry in Oxfordshire during the war and that Unity Mitford had been one of her clients. Her aunt's business, in the tiny village of Wigginton, had depended on discretion and she had told no one except her sister that Unity had had a baby. Her sister had passed the story on to her daughter Val.

I casually asked who she thought the father might be and there was a short silence on the other end of the line before she said: "Well, she always said it was Hitler's."

I must say I was tempted at this point to put down the phone. Christmas was coming and I was very busy. But for some reason I decided to carry on listening to this bizarre tale. Val didn't sound mad, and she said she was merely passing on a family story.

The child was a boy, she believed, and he had been given up for adoption. She didn't want any money; she just wanted me to look into it. So here was the prospect of Adolf Hitler's love child alive somewhere in Britain - it was either the scoop of the century or completely bonkers. But it had to be worth a few hours of my time, even if it turned out to be a dead end.

My original story had cast doubt on the official version of events about Unity Mitford's return from Germany. In the millions of words written about the Mitfords, accounts of Unity's movements in those early months of 1940 remain sketchy. And, despite the obvious trauma to the family, only a handful of the hundreds of letters that the letter-writing sisters have had published discuss this period.

The newly released diaries of Guy Liddell, number two at MI5 during the war, suggested that the security service was not even convinced Unity had shot herself in the head. Liddell was determined that Unity should be searched and interrogated on her return from Germany and then interned for her Nazi sympathies.

Writing on 2 January 1940, Liddell made a powerful case. "Unity Mitford had been in close and intimate contact with the Führer and his supporters for several years, and was an ardent and open supporter of the Nazi regime. She had remained behind after the outbreak of war and her action came perilously close to high treason. Her parents had been associated with the Anglo-German Fellowship and other kindred movements, and had obviously supported her in her ideas about Hitler.

"We had no evidence at all in support of the press allegations that she was in a serious state of health and it might well be that she was being brought in on a stretcher in order to avoid publicity and unpleasantness to her family."

However, Liddell failed to convince his superiors and the home secretary himself, Sir John Anderson, finally intervened to say that nothing should be done on Unity's return. In fact, Liddell was wrong about her injuries. She had indeed shot herself and later died of an infection caused by the bullet in the brain.

Nonetheless, it still seems astonishing that she was never questioned, considering how close she was to Hitler. As Liddell wrote at the time: "If we had been dealing with Miss Smith or Miss Joyce, the probability was that we should not be arguing the case."

If it hadn't been for Wigginton, I would never have taken it any further. Val gave me an address for the maternity home, Hill View Cottage, and I contacted the present owner, who agreed to show me around. She confirmed that Nurse Norton had indeed used the cottage in her work as a midwife. She also agreed to introduce me to the one person in the village who remembered Unity being there. Audrey Smith was a little girl at the time, but by pure chance her sister (now dead, unfortunately) had worked at the home and had talked about Unity. Audrey herself claimed she had seen Unity wrapped in a blanket and looking very ill. However, she insisted that she was at the home not to have a baby, but to recover from a nervous breakdown.

By now I was intrigued and wrote to Unity's surviving sister, Deborah, the Duchess of Devonshire. She had been angry at my original article and had written a furious letter to the Observer denouncing Liddell's claims that her sister might not have shot herself. She also suggested I take less notice of the gossip of villagers. The Duchess of Devonshire was adamant that there was nothing in the Wigginton story and claimed she could, if necessary, produce her mother's diaries to prove it.

At this point I decided to return to the National Archives, where I discovered a file on Unity that had been sealed under the "100-year rule" - reserved for only the highest classification of top-secret files. An official told me that it was possible to have the classification of such files reviewed and I applied to have the file opened. To my great surprise, the Home Office agreed. Inside was a startling new piece of information: it wasn't quite the birth certificate of a child, but here was hard evidence that Unity might not have been quite the invalid it was supposed.

By October 1941, while she was living at the family home in Swinbrook, Oxfordshire, the police picked up rumours that "Unity Mitford has formed an attachment for an officer in the RAF". Further investigation found that she had been "consorting with Pilot Officer John Sidney Andrews, an RAF test pilot".

As a result, Andrews, married with a child, was transferred to the far north of Scotland.

At this point, the trail went cold. There were too many loose ends for a news story and my research sat in my notebooks until this year when I mentioned it to Mark Roberts, an executive from Channel 4, who agreed to put the story on film. Further research, including an exhaustive trawl through birth records at the Oxfordshire register office, confirmed that Nurse Norton had helped dozens of wartime mothers give birth at her maternity home. But no record of Unity Mitford. Airman Andrews, it turns out, was a former bank clerk, and died in a Spitfire crash in 1945. There is no evidence that he ever saw Unity after his transfer to Scotland.

So what is the truth about Unity Mitford's missing months? Is it possible that the sightings in Wigginton were a case of mistaken identity? Or was she there to recover from a nervous breakdown? One woman still alive who could add to the story is the Duchess of Devonshire, formerly Deborah Mitford, who travelled back to Britain with Unity in 1940. But she has so far declined to be interviewed for the programme. She has also told people close to her that any suggestion of a child is fanciful.

Five years on from that original phone call, I have taken this story as far as I can. It remains a mystery and I remain as sceptical as I was when I first spoke to Val Hann. But one nagging thought remains: if Unity Mitford was in Wigginton during the war, what was she doing at a maternity home?

"Hitler's British Girl" will be shown on Channel 4 on Thursday 20 December at 9pm

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

25 comments from readers

Carl Jones
13 December 2007 at 21:01

Mr Bright, have you heard of the book "Hitler was a British Agent"?

The book suggest that Hitler was an illegitimate Rothschild who was conceived in the Rothschild mansion in Geneva. The Rothschilds looked after Hitler through second and third parties. Around 1912/13, Hitler came to the UK for quite a long period, at least a year. Much of this time was spent in Tavistock in Devon (Tavistock Institute) where he was prepared for his future role in WW2. Hitler faught in the First World War and as I understand it, Hitler was a runner. He was twice captured, but British intelligence let him live...normally, he`d have been shot on the spot.

During the 20`s and 30`s, the UK/US establishment (inc the Bush family) invested big time in the German war machine. Hitler was installed as Chancellor and so the elite constructed Second World War was set in motion. Churchill was picked because he would fight...much like Blair`s blood lust in Iraq.

The establishment made loads of money. Germany was subjugated, guilt ridden and still occupied to this day. The European Union was created in Bildreberg meetings and the elite constructed Second World War led to the creation of Isreal, of which the Rothschilds were major financiers.

If Unity Mitford was a Hitler groupie, maybe she was a British intelligence asset. The timings would suggest extraction just after the start of the war and maybe she was carrying Hitlers child??

I have only touched on the evidence outlined in the above mentioned book. This account, while very upsetting to many people, makes more sense that a contrived history written by winners...no wonder that no one is allowed to question any aspect of the Holocaust.

While I`m on this subject, we must remember the allied war crime of Dresden...another Tavistock experiment. We must also keep in mind that much of Germany was being bombed to hell during the closing months of the war. A retreating German army and the allied bombing of road a rail links ment that most of Germany was very short on food. so anyone held in any type of prison camp would be last in the food chain....you can draw your own conclusions.:)

Robert Powell
14 December 2007 at 15:44

Tony Blair's new book 'I'm really Hitler's lovechild' casts some light on these issues. Much older than he looks, it explains how Herr Blair had land-grabbing delusions, eyed but failed to secure the job of president of Europe before ending his days ranting in a bunker disguised as a sizeable town house near Paddington. The tome's final page is more revealing than some will be able to stomach - a photograph proving that, like his birth Führer, Tony has only got one.

Carl Jones
14 December 2007 at 21:21

Mr Powrll...the odd joke would be in order, but an entire repost lacking any serious debate is risible.

It is not my fault that unseen hands make historical orgami....of course, if you disagree, you can always argue the dullards version of history. This is not to say that comment is totally correct, but it mike far more sense.:)

Pencils
15 December 2007 at 14:40

Hitler ate my granny!

Tom Knott
15 December 2007 at 18:19

If there was a child, given the secrecy that would have been sought, then the registration of birth could have been anywhere. The upper classes sometimes registered births as occurring in the "right" place rather than the actual clinic. Also, the parental names could have been false. Add to that the complications of the period, with many families away from their home patches, the child would have been one of many.

Robert Powell
15 December 2007 at 20:33

Serious debate, with you Carl? Now that is risible.

hac.vanasten
15 December 2007 at 22:48

Does anyone really think that this Mitford, considerably more stupid than Braun, would ever keep silence about having a child with Hitler ?

Robert Powell
16 December 2007 at 09:30

Well hac, she might if she were dead. Hang on though...

Alfred1958
17 December 2007 at 09:21

And even if one of the greatest criminals of the 20th century had a son - what would this mean to the present situation of Britain and Europe?

We´ve got a lot of problems all around the world, let´s solve them and forget the ugly past.

Do you think that the fact of Stalin´s daughter livining in the US has anything to do with the present political situation ?

So let´s certain question beeing answered by historians but they cannot give us a useful answer for our common future.

Alfred from Vienna/Austria

mikemykel
19 December 2007 at 01:30

If she had had Hitler's child the poor thing would have almost certainly have been "stillborn" and quickly disposed of.

Cybertiger
19 December 2007 at 09:33

I wonder if the police could be persuaded to do a trawl of their DNA database for a match with Hitler amongst criminals in their seventies.

Robert Powell
19 December 2007 at 10:48

In their late sixties, surely, Cybertiger! I tell you Blair isn't as young as he looks.

Stephen
19 December 2007 at 11:57

lol!

Cybertiger
19 December 2007 at 12:30

We may have to look overseas for the devils offspring. I suspect Hitler had a daughter who may have disappeared off to the USA in mysterious circumstances. Of course, criminals may lie about their age, especially the female ones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_Albright

In my view, Madeleine Albright should be subjected to a DNA test, assuming a result is not already on the FBI database. But then where powerful politicians are concerned I don’t think one should entirely trust the American intelligence services.

Cybertiger
19 December 2007 at 12:45

The familial likeness between Unity and her ‘daughter’ is extraordinary … and that with Adolf is alarming …

http://www.zpub.com/un/un-ma.html

““What’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about, if we can’t use it?” ... as remembered in Colin Powell’s memoir. Powell wrote that he almost had an aneurysm, he was so upset.”

“"Thank G-d, we sent George Mitchell and not Madeleine [Albright] to Ireland. We'd be bombing them this morning" -- Senator Ernest Hollings, on brokering peace in Northern Ireland.”

cyberbabe
20 December 2007 at 23:39

M. Allbright is the lovechild of hitler and unity mitford? Anythings possible.............. maybe hitler shot her in the head?? She didn't look too sick in the tv footage on tonights tv prog. proof that too much pedigree is a bad thing. We brits are partly to blame for the war - what with that other nazi - prince charles edward and others. Its all coming out now.

from cyberbabe

Cybertiger
21 December 2007 at 12:11

@cyberpuss

“maybe hitler shot her in the head?? She didn't look too sick in the tv footage on tonights tv prog.”

Do you think Hitler could have shot Ms. Albright in the head? Could that explain her stupid behaviour?

Hec
29 December 2007 at 20:00

Diana Mitford claimed, in a letter to Unity in March of 1946 (which recently surfaced inside the lining of an old leather case purchased in Portobello Road), that The Fuhrer had always wanted to be with Unity but was also very much in love with Ms. Braun who he, in the end chose over Ms. Mitford. The deciding factor was apparently that, "Eva does not at all mind Hitler's rather gooey bottom, but I know how you (Unity) must have found it repulsive."

Cybertiger
31 December 2007 at 10:13

Hec, what's a "gooey bottom" - on Hitler or anyone else?

towncrier
02 January 2008 at 15:17

good ere innit?

llloyd
03 January 2008 at 23:13

Such a love child one could assume would be of noticable eastern european and aristocratic looks. A lover and creator of rhythmic music and art. Talented with language. A megalomaniac who might think himself bigger than Christ. A charismatic figure drawing huge crowds who worship him. Idolised by youth and respected by the old. Counted among the top ten english figures in his'tory in a modern poll. Maybe in the confusion of Word War Two and need to absolve the english upper class, he was switched with a dead baby during a German air raid. The year fitts but not exctly the months. It'sa fun thought anyway.

mountainhome
12 May 2008 at 07:32

ok i get te story but did she shoot herself or did she just have a spell of madness then died of mysterious circumstanses or was she bed riden it would be a horror if she was brain dead with a baby inside if not hitlers then some other nazi elite that she met.

littlethinker
19 May 2008 at 09:14

Very interesting, but no-one has done any simple maths - Max Mosely is 68............?

littlethinker
19 May 2008 at 09:15

Very interesting, but no-one has done any simple maths - Max Mosely is 68. Surely not..........?

taylahhillllllx
22 May 2008 at 20:00

woaahhh, i think that this whole thing is really weird, im online searching to see if hitler really had children because i found a book in my library saying that he did, and i just wanted to get more information, thanks everyone!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Martin Bright began his journalistic career writing in very simple English for a magazine aimed at French school children. This experience has informed his style ever since. He worked for the BBC World Service, and The Guardian before joining the Observer as Education Correspondent. He went on to become Home Affairs Editor before becoming the New Statesman's political editor in 2005.

Recent Posts

Libel Tourism Revisited

  • By Martin Bright
  • 22 July 2008

Karadzic and Srebrenica

  • By Martin Bright
  • 22 July 2008

Obama, Brown and the Commentators

  • By Martin Bright
  • 21 July 2008

A Big Beast Speaks

  • By Martin Bright
  • 18 July 2008

Hazel Blears and IslamExpo

  • By Martin Bright
  • 18 July 2008

After Gordon

  • By Martin Bright
  • 17 July 2008

Libel Tourism in the UK

  • By Martin Bright
  • 16 July 2008