Registered user login:

How Catholic-bashing became respectable

Melanie McDonagh

Published 06 December 2007

It is worth asking in passing whether Jews could now be depicted with the same idiom as is now being deployed against Catholics

It's not that often a train of thought unites Nicole Kidman and Peter Viereck, the American maverick conservative. But I had been to a screening of The Golden Compass, the film that Kidman effortlessly illumines, and I was thinking about the villain of the piece, which wasn't anyone at all so much as an institution called the Magisterium. In the Philip Pullman novel on which the film is based, the other word for the Magisterium is the Church. Or, as the author explains, "Ever since Pope John Calvin had moved the seat of the papacy to Geneva and set up the Consistorial Court of Discipline, the Church's power over every aspect of life had been absolute. The papacy itself had been abolished after Calvin's death, and a tangle of courts, colleges and councils, collectively known as the Magisterium, had grown up in its place."

The clerics of the Magisterium are characteri sed by authoritarianism, hatred of sexuality, a penchant for heresy-hunting and black vestments, and an animus towards intellectual inquiry. Or as Eva Green, in the role of the witch Serafina Pekkala, hisses, they're out to get "Free Will".

This is, in other words, the pocket image of the Catholic Church carried by many British liberals - except that, for Rome, read Geneva. Which brings us to Peter Viereck and his remark that "anti-Catholicism is the anti-Semitism of the intellectual". Every group needs its bogeymen to reinforce a collective identity and, for British liberalism, that function is usefully fulfilled by the Church.

As it happens, I rather enjoyed the rollicking pace and the scary bearfights of The Golden Compass, and I devoured the books. But the mental furniture that occupies the novels and the film - the creepy cleric who doesn't baulk at poison, the glowering institution that opposes free intellectual inquiry (and, oddly, is situated in the Royal Naval College) - why, it comes from a familiar part of the English nursery, the bogey of anti-popery.

Actually, to get some idea of the suppositions on which this kind of anti-Catholicism is based you need only return to the cinema to see Elizabeth. That, too, is redeemed by a luminous actress, Cate Blanchett, but it is a remarkable summary of the old Protestant clichés about Catholicism as the other, the enemy.

The Catholics in it are physically deformed, shrouded in darkness and forever doing funny things with dripping vats of blood-red dye, and Philip of Spain goes around clutching not one rosary but several (how many does a man need?). Elizabeth, by contrast, is bathed in light just to illustrate that she embodies a kind of proto-Enlightenment - she kicks off by declaring that she will judge her subjects by their actions, not beliefs - and she rounds off her exhortation to the troops at Tilbury by declaring that the Spanish ships carry "the Inquisition in their bowels". And, sure enough, when the ships go down, rosaries and a cross go floating to the bottom.

Of course, there are elements of truth in all this - that's the thing about clichés - yet it's also a travesty of history. Elizabeth's way of dealing with her Catholic problem resulted in the torture and deaths of some 200 Catholics - indeed, two conspirators are tortured in the film. But the moral of both films is simple: that the Catholic Church is the enemy of freedom and reason.

Of course, there is infinite scope in film, as in ordinary secular polemic, for a frank examination of the relationship between the Church and freedom of intellectual inquiry. It would be nice, incidentally, if that debate could be rather better informed. It was ironic to find Eva Green hissing that the Magisterium is out to get Free Will, given that the Catholic Church was once the great defender of that doctrine.

But to get back to Viereck's dictum, it is worth asking in passing whether Jews could now be depicted with the same idiom as is now being deployed against Catholics. You don't have to think particularly hard to conjure up the Semitic equivalent of the crazed popish assassin, the Jesuit plotter, the Vatican conspiracy against the nation state, do you? But while the stereotype of the Jew is dead, that of the Catholic Church as a force for evil has been given a new, and rather disagreeable, lease on life.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

47 comments from readers

gnuneo
06 December 2007 at 13:41

oh PLEASE!

anti-semitism is a *racist* vilification, the jew is hated because of what they are *born* as, not because of what they choose to beleive.

a catholic could easily leave the dark ages and follow a more enlightened philosophy (one that does not hate women, regarding them as so inferior they are not even allowed to be initiated into the 'secrets', to become members of the priesthood, or one that does not beleive that absolute power should be given to someone chosen by a small and select group, ie is not profoundly anti-democratic, one that believes not that Man is here to abuse and rape the Earth as we see fit but are guardians of Her for future generations and other species, one that is not so insane as to beleive in armageddon and all the other apocalyptic BS the catholic Empire and all (most) of the other so-called 'christian' stand for.)

why do people vilify the Church? Because it deserves it. Simple as that. And NOTHING comparable to anti-semitism.

freebird
06 December 2007 at 14:37

It is estimated that nearly 32,000 people were burned at the stake in just the Spanish part of the Inquistion. Guilty of simply not being Catholic. Hard to square that with your assertion that this was a Church that championed Free Will.

dawkin's goat
06 December 2007 at 15:48

gnuneo, freebird = bigots

Cybertiger
06 December 2007 at 16:06

I wonder if dawkin's goat is a sufferer of Catholic guilt. I believe many Catholics suffer guilt and many more deserve to suffer.

Cybertiger
06 December 2007 at 16:34

When I think of Catholics as a ‘force for evil’, I think of the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) – the court which selects the POTUS – and Justice Antonin Scalia – closely followed in the devilry stakes by Thomas, Alito and Lord Chief Justice Roberts.

http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2022

Scalia here justifies the divine right of the powerful Catholic-American to exact capital retribution ... just when the whim takes Him and his flock of sheep. Scalia is the archetypal 'Good Shepherd' ... who in reality is the devil.

antonia
06 December 2007 at 17:59

Too bad freebird and gnuneo don't know much about doctrine or history.

Freebird: The Church has championed the fact that people have free will against such beliefs as Calvinist predestination, which stated that God chose certain people to be saved and certain others to be damned, and they could do nothing about it. Catholicism also champions free will against current "scientific" beliefs that we are determined by our genes, our upbringing, the chemical reactions in our brains, etc.

Gnuneo: The Church has never hated women. If you can't bring yourself to read doctrine from actual Catholic sources, just look at Mary (Queen of Heaven, "before whom angels and prophets are struck dumb"), and the huge number of women saints. Women are not barred from priesthood becuase of any non-existent inferiority, but because God assigns different roles to men and women. And there are no "secrets" in the priesthood, hidden from the ordinary Catholic.

gb
06 December 2007 at 22:07

Melanie, Don't you love it when so many of your commentors make your point for you?

E.g., cybertiger, freebird, gn: In their world, bigotry is acceptable as long as its aimed at the Big Bad Catholic Church. .

Augustinus
06 December 2007 at 22:47

Feebird – the following is a response to your post and others who love to cite the inquisition to support your bias and justification for your Catholic Church bashing/bigotry:

As Denish D’Souza, author of "What's So Great About Christianity", put it:

“It is strange to witness the passion with which some secular figures rail against the misdeeds of the Crusaders and Inquisitors more than 500 years ago. The number sentenced to death by the Spanish Inquisition appears to be about 10,000. Some historians contend that an additional 100,000 died in jail due to malnutrition or illness.”

“These figures are tragic, and of course population levels were much lower at the time. But even so, they are minuscule compared with the death tolls produced by the atheist despotisms of the 20th century. In the name of creating their version of a religion-free utopia, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong produced the kind of mass slaughter that no Inquisitor could possibly match. Collectively these atheist tyrants murdered more than 100 million people.”

Source:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1121/p09s01-coop.html

Something to ponder and to put into perspective, don’t you think?

Mark

Guy Fawkes
07 December 2007 at 05:03

Let me make this clear: The Spanish Inquisition only had jursidiction over baptised Catholics!

Cybertiger
07 December 2007 at 12:02

In my view, Madeleine Albright is one of the contemporary world’s most vile human beings.

The lady was apparently brought up a Roman Catholic but in her later years crossed the sectarian divide to the Episcopal Church of the USA. However, the dear woman was possessed of a Jewish mother, who, along with her Jewish father, converted to Christianity to avoid persecution in her native Czechoslovakia. I wonder what part of her national-ethno- religious make up made her such a powerfully despicable person.

the wannabe saint
07 December 2007 at 12:36

gnuneo wrote:

"a catholic could easily leave the dark ages and follow a more enlightened philosophy (one that does not hate women, regarding them as so inferior they are not even allowed to be initiated into the 'secrets', to become members of the priesthood, or one that does not beleive that absolute power should be given to someone chosen by a small and select group, ie is not profoundly anti-democratic, one that believes not that Man is here to abuse and rape the Earth as we see fit but are guardians of Her for future generations and other species, one that is not so insane as to beleive in armageddon and all the other apocalyptic BS the catholic Empire and all (most) of the other so-called 'christian' stand for.) "

Dear, gnuneo

It seems that you are not very familiar with the teachings or beliefs of the Catholic Church. The Church does not hate or mistreat women in the least bit. In fact some of the most prominent people in Church history are women. We as Catholics absolutely love and honor Jesus’ mother Mary. A lot of the most celebrated Saints are women. The reason that the Church does not ordain women to the priesthood is because it doesn’t have the authority to do so. (Jesus is a man & chose only men to be his disciples & later apostles. These are the models for the Church.) We (man & woman) have different roles in life. I don’t see many liberals complaining that men should have the right to become pregnant and bare children. That doesn’t mean that one role is superior over the other. Women play a very vital role in the Church; the fact that they can not be ordained to the priesthood does not detract from the vital importance that the Church places on women.

You also wrote: “or one that does not believe that absolute power should be given to someone chosen by a small and select group, ie is not profoundly anti-democratic, one that believes not that Man is here to abuse and rape the Earth as we see fit but are guardians of Her for future generations”

We as Catholics believe that Jesus chose one man to be the head of his Church and that was Peter as read in the bible, Mathew 16:15-20. And the office given to Peter (the first pope)has been passed on by apostolic succession and will continue to be passed on till the end of the world. Jesus came to establish a kingdom, not a democracy. And the Church teaches very adamantly that we are to be good stewards of the earth and of the resources that have been provided us so graciously by our loving God.

gnuneo, please visit your local Catholic Church and speak to a priest about any questions that you may have. Jesus is waiting to love you and wants you to turn to him.

The Wannabe saint

Cybertiger
07 December 2007 at 12:54

@The Wannabe saint

I think you're too good to be true!

the wannabe saint
07 December 2007 at 14:04

cybertiger,

why do you say that?

fishinpole
07 December 2007 at 14:10

I find it always very surprising and interesting that the anti-Christian, anti-Catholic, Left, or secular humanist as they like to call themselves now, always seem to find ways to denegrate and name-call against Christians or other religious.

However, I NEVER see or hear anything that they say or do to support their belief system, let alone say or do anything positive about who or what they are. Can it be that their position and belief system cannot be supported by anything positive.

God bless them all.

fishinpole

PeteRam
07 December 2007 at 14:52

To all you Inquisition buffs - GET OVER IT!!!! Do you see Catholics killing people today? NO! That was hundreds of years ago and no doubt concieved by a number of misguided so-called Christians.

Stop holding it over their heads for crying out loud. It's in the past Let it go!

(You'll feel much better)

PeteRam
07 December 2007 at 15:06

Cybertiger wrote: "When I think of Catholics as a ‘force for evil’, I think of the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) – the court which selects the POTUS"

Your ignorance is supreme CT. Let me ask you, have you read the Florida statutes from the year 2000? Let me tell you - because I live there - that the statutes stated that in order for an automatic recount to commence, the election had to first be certified by the Secretary of State. She was trying to do that when liberal democrats like Jesse Jackson came swooping in and started South Florida's recount - ILLEGALLY!!

The 7 - 2 SCOTUS decision said that all counting should cease as it was being done illegally and without proper oversight, and certified the original statewide recount as the final decision.

Numerous unofficial recounts by media companies afterward confirmed that indeed, GWB WON the election.

Point is - get your facts straight before showing your total and utter ignorance for all to see.

cultural protestant
07 December 2007 at 15:21

English Protestantism is the only thing that has saved the world from being tyrannized. If it weren't for English Protestantism providing the world with hundreds of theological positions from which people could freely choose, all people would be enslaved to the autocratic 'Magisterium.' That's why and how the British Empire conquering the world spread freedom. That's why and how the USofA as the world's lone super power brings freedom every time it sends its troops to a new land. Like the British Empire, the USofA exports inter-denominational and inter-religious tolerance. And if the English Protestants hadn't destroyed all political and economic power of the Catholicsin the Britisj Isles, none of that great good could have come to pass. That's what the movie Elizabeth is about. What the Golden Compass is about is to warn that the tyranny of intolerant Catholicism can return full force if free people are not vigilant. And as for linking this necessary fear of the rebirth of Catholic intolerance to anti-Semitism - what garbage. The Puritans were pro-Jewish and in fact freed Jews from the tryanny of the Catholic church in England. The Puritans saw Jews as fellow peoples of The Book and both saw Catholics as idolatrous pagans. Jews are free tp rise to all positions of power in English Protestant lands, but under Catholic medieval tyranny, they are slaves. The only way to fight anti-Semitism fully is to be anti-Catholic.

gmiguelps
07 December 2007 at 16:01

TO Freebird, your numbers are false and your history skewed. The Spanish Inquistion was about traitors to SPain who would convert to the Catholic FAith to hide their true identity (Mohamedans or jews working to overthrow the esixiting government). It was the secualr Authorities that carried out the executions and for being traitors not because of not believing the faith.

milo
07 December 2007 at 16:19

Seems the bigots are providing ample proof of Melanie's article.

bobbylang
07 December 2007 at 18:04

I feel there is a tremendous amount of ignorance in the anti-catholic comments, and obvious tyrannical bigotry as demonstrated by those authors!

The statistics quoted would be humorous if not a perfect assusation of the shallow understanding of the likes of "freebird" and "guano" or whoever!!

Bobbylang

Innerparty
07 December 2007 at 21:20

What's cool about many of the responses to this article, particularly responses coming from the heart of the former British Empire, is that they (the responses), support the author's position so beautifully.

I almost wonder if the author paid some unemployed cranks to post this stuff.

gnuneo
08 December 2007 at 13:42

how utterly amusing catholic apologists haven't spotted (or simply ignored what they cannot accept) that anti-semitism and anti-catholicism are entirely different!

yes, we have 'proved' that some have strong dislike for the catholic church, but that translates neither into regarding catholics as a racial grouping (which anti-semitism IS), nor with bigotry - it simply shows that this ORGANISATION that has brought incomprehensible suffering and horrors to the world with its medieval worldview and corruption of the messages of Jesus.

"The palaces and great wealth of the Catholic Church say more than any else possible of the commitment of the Church to the emancipation of the poor and oppressed".

the 'worship' of mary is regarded as little more than idolatry by the Church, and everywhere the Church spread its patriarchal tendencies women have been degraded, the so called "witch-trials" were simply the most overt expression of this. The Church has been involved in poliical manipulations, in the establishment of an Empire (highly doubtful that was ever a goal of Jesus himself), in wars, in genocides, in the mass murder of those who do not agree with its interpretations in its attempt to impose its unitary, totalitarian doctrine across the world.

it is a foul, undemocratic and obnoxious power structure, one far more in line with the 'satanic' beliefs it purports to oppose, than with ANY ideas of Jesus that it claims as its exclusive territory.

the world will be a better place once it vanishes into the River of Time.

jfigurel
09 December 2007 at 04:22

In fact, the Spanish inquisition was conducted by civil authorities, and the Church intervened to minimize the suffering. Y'all need to bone up on your history.

Brooke01
09 December 2007 at 20:56

Looking at the posts above, there's an awful lot of evidence for Catholophobia being hugely based on complete ignorance of Roman Catholicism.

bogsi
09 December 2007 at 20:56

jfigurel

"In fact, the Spanish inquisition was conducted by civil authorities, and the Church intervened to minimize the suffering. Y'all need to bone up on your history."

Can You prove it?

Brooke01
09 December 2007 at 20:59

Looking at the posts above, they seem to evidence the claim that Catholiphobia is hugely based on completely based on received stereotypes swimming around in a massive sea of complete ignorance about the Roman Catholic church.

bogsi
09 December 2007 at 21:09

Brooke01

"Looking at the posts above, there's an awful lot of evidence for Catholophobia being hugely based on complete ignorance of Roman Catholicism."

As far as i can see, there are only two, let`s call them, "anti-catholics" posts.

dont you all just overreacting a little bit ?

There is much more agression and contempt for man in your posts,

btw

Hitler was not an atheist

Boguslaw Siemiatkowski

Polish but not Catholic

Brooke01
09 December 2007 at 21:19

Perhaps we are over-reacting, but, the reason we would be over-reacting is because we (people with Catholic backgrounds) are tired of hearing the ignorant cliched comments of people with Protestant backgrounds.

rnmom
09 December 2007 at 22:52

All bigots...Catholic bashers for sure...following the no-nothings...does this apply to hate speech? oooh!

Brooke01
09 December 2007 at 23:40

I definitely agree that many ideologies (including fascism, communism, evangelism, catholicism, etc etc) can, at least in some sense, be deemed responsible for many wrongs, including institutionalised murder, illiberalism, the maintenance of superstitution.... However, it seems to me doubtful that any of these ideologies in particular can conclusively be shown to have something inherent in them which encourages people to behave in ways which modern liberal orthodoxy considers unacceptable. It seems more likely that such ideologies are used to validate practices which are useful to those at the top of the power chain everywhere (and of all hues).

jimdenham
09 December 2007 at 23:53

The attempt by people like McDonough (and Christina Odone), to compare hostility to Catholicism, to anti-semitism, is simply despicable. have you Catholics no sense of history? When were you the victims of genocide (as opposed to supporting it?). Your attempts to provide youselves with special protection, in the way that Muslims have succeeded in persuading the government to give them, is simply proof of your intellectual bankruptcy. "The stereotype of the Jew is dead", says McDonagh: oh yes? So how about the enthusiasm with which Mearsheimer & Walt's conspiracy theories have been greeted by the "left" (including this publication), and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown's recent willingness to write about "the shadowy role of Labour friends of Israel"? And McDonagh has the audacity to claim hat anti-semitism is a thing of the past, whilst anti-Catholicism is a potent force? What offensive nonsense!

Picies
09 December 2007 at 23:58

To all the anti-catholics on this site: As Archbishop Fulton Sheen observed: " There is not but a handfull of people who truly hate the Catholic Church; but there are millions and millions who hate what they mistakenly think the Catholic Church teaches ." True knowledge is a powerful weapon.

jimdenham
10 December 2007 at 00:25

"Millions hate what they mistakenly think the Catholic Church teaches": so what, exactly *does* the Catholic church teach about contraception and AIDS, Picies?

Brooke01
10 December 2007 at 00:37

But why so single out the Catholic Church for these beliefs? And how many practising Catholics (not to count all those with Catholic backgrounds who are now agnostics/aetheists) privately completely disagree with the Church's teaching?

Cybertiger
10 December 2007 at 08:04

The fated triangulation of Catholics, Jews and Americans has one huge commonality – these powerful religionists believe they are a force for good in the world when all the evidence is contradictory.

Cybertiger
10 December 2007 at 08:06

@PeteRam

"The 7 - 2 SCOTUS decision said that all counting should cease as it was being done illegally and without proper oversight, and certified the original statewide recount as the final decision. "

This represents a Catholic split vote on the SCOTUS I presume – and pudding proof of complete and total US banana republicanism.

LionelBear
10 December 2007 at 11:54

I'm surprised that no-one has pointed that a problem with the above article is that "John Calvin" was a Protestant. So, the fantasy world that Pullman creates is one in which the Protestant Reformation has emerged triumphant and the whole world has been placed under the same form of moral scrutiny as was exerted by the the consistory court in Calvin's Geneva. If it is an attack on any specific Christian denomination, it's Calvinist Protestantism, not poor, beleaguered Catholicism. Hence the attack on free will because of Calvinist belief in pre-destination.

Amihai
10 December 2007 at 15:58

It is time intelligent people realized that the Jewish people (formerly Hebrews and Israelites) is a people, a civilization that is nearly 4,000 year old at the core of which one finds among other elements a religion, accepted by this people at some point along its evolvement. To compare Judaism, the civilization of the Jewish people, to Catholicism or any community of faith is indicative how much the one making the comparison does not know about Judaism, unless of course the use of the term is done strictly in order to attract more readership…..

Pierre
10 December 2007 at 21:49

Bring me your alter boys.....................................

Pierre
10 December 2007 at 21:51

We all know the leader of the catholic church is infallible, and there is nothing wrong with cross dressing.........................

Pierre
10 December 2007 at 21:54

As for the jewish [civilization ] one only has to look at the occupation of Palestine to understand there is still work to be done.

Ergo
11 December 2007 at 03:07

Perhaps the most loathesome of all Catholic apologias cite women saints and the virgin Mary, Queen of Heaven as proof that the church does not hate women.

What can you answer to such arguments? Yes, they love women so long as women are perenially self-sacrificing and deferential to men. They are too dull apparently to see that, in the first place, sacrifice that is mandated by sex is no sacrifice at all because there is no choice; you are here to sacrifice yourself.

Secondly, some of the saints' lives are less edifying than hair-raising. Criticism of the church is not necessarily criticism of all Catholics who are after all

born into this religion and accordingly, as St. Ignatius Loyola said, "give me a child at the age of six and I will give you a Catholic for life". I don't call massive book-burning, forbidden-book indexing a call to utilizing free will. The Catholic church is an anachronism and considering their treatment of Jews over centuries, it is some irony to equate critcism of it to anti-Semitism.

gnuneo
11 December 2007 at 13:23

simple fact: how many millions across our planet still die of starvation, and how many $trillions is the catholic 'church' worth?

"christian"? "message of Jesus"?

excuse me while i puke up on your hypocrisy.

Pencils
13 December 2007 at 07:45

Try this : 'Catholic church, incorporated' by Valerio Volpi, for at least the tip of the iceberg of the RC's political and economic power.

http://www.counterpunch.org/volpi11172007.html

"...there are no "secrets" in the priesthood, hidden from the ordinary Catholic." - Antonio

I loathe Sinn Fein, but I'll say this for them: in their paper An phoblacht (or something like that) they have been the foremost, if not the only, exposers of the amount of money paid by the RC to keep certain 'secrets' out of court - in fact the actual scale of these 'secrets' is so vast that they could not possible have been 'secret'; also the length of time this 'secret' endured - Michael Farrell in his wonderful novel ' Thy Tears Might Cease' writes of this in the time of the independence struggle - funnily enough, the book wasn't published, and only in a heavily abridged form, until the 1960s. - so maybe Antonia is right. But is that a good thing.

EJT
18 December 2007 at 22:10

I would be grateful if our Roman Catholic contributors would confirm that the Catholic Church still recognizes the validity of Pope Pius V's 1570 bull 'Regnans in Excelsis', which deposed Elizabeth I of England and absolved her catholic subjects of their sworn allegiance to her.

And would they also confirm that the current Pope still possess the plenitude of power to do the same for the subjects of Elizabeth II should he ever be divinely inspired to do so in the light of Her Majesty's or her government's behavior?

Oi_Malloi
08 January 2008 at 17:03

Freedom of speech, simple, thats how catholic bashing came about. Now deal with it.

zeroKnots
13 March 2008 at 10:52

Wow! Melanie McDonagh, if you can get some commission for selling books and films, you must be doing NICELY!

No "Sloth" on the anti-Catholic side.

For the life of me I can't figure out why. Do Cathoholics have secret lynch-mobs or something or is this just the usual Atheist "terrified of the absolute truth of one's own existance"?

Not rational, whatever it is.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?