Registered user login:

Labour veteran slates 'open door' immigration

Frank Field

Published 18 October 2007

The economic benefit of immigration is miniscule compared to the cost argues Frank Field as he lays into Labour's 'open door' policy

The Government’s open door policy on immigration has led to an unprecedented level of new arrivals. Over the last three years alone, something like two million newcomers have moved to these shores. Two reports out yesterday showed that the economic benefits are small, compared with the extra costs imposed on social services.

While there is no doubt that most recent migrants have come here to work, the beneficial effects on the economy are less certain. A report by the Home Office claims that migrants add £6 billion a year to the nation’s income.

But, as MigrationWatch point out, the benefit is miniscule when you consider that this amounts to half a percent of total production and that new arrivals add at least half a percent to the population. So the effect on GDP per head is tiny.

Importantly, the Home Office report didn’t focus on the effect migration is having on the Government’s welfare to work programme. The drive to get British unemployed into work is clearly being hampered by migration.

What else can account for the fact that while three million new jobs have been created since 1997, the number of British people on out of work benefits has only fallen from 5.65 to 5.4 million? Most of the new jobs have been taken by immigrant workers.

Why should a business bother to recruit and train the young British unemployed when they can get cheap and already qualified labour from abroad?

The second report from the Migration Impacts Forum, established to look at the social costs of migration, re-stated what everybody from the Local Government Association to the Head of Cambridgeshire police have said time and again.

Eight different regions took part in a consultation and of these, five reported increased difficulties on crime, six experienced growing pressures with health services and seven drew attention to growing housing problems resulting from immigration.

Everybody is now agreed, after years of mis-management, that the level and rate of immigration needs to be checked and brought in line, not only with the particular business needs, but also with the resources available to deliver high quality social services. The open door policy on immigration should be over.

But the Government will be unable to make this work under current EU agreements because new members of the EU have full rights to travel and reside in this country, and apart from temporary restrictions imposed on Bulgaria and Romania, to work here too.

Given that living standards in the old Eastern block are around one third of our own, it is no surprise they want to come here in large numbers. They will continue to do so until their economies catch up. But this will take decades. The Government must therefore begin talks on renegotiating the free movement of labour in the EU.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

Chris
19 October 2007 at 07:54

Frank Field has lost it completely. The free movement of people is one of the most wonderful acheivements of the EU. Now he wants to make Britain in to a prison to appease racists. He belongs on the nutter right of the tory party. He is not a serious politician and should not be taken seriously

terryuno
19 October 2007 at 12:34

I agree with Chris. East Europeans are hard working and educated people. Surely the answer is to restrict people from outside the E.U. Funny how people like Frank Field never objected to immigration from Africa and Asia.

Digger77
19 October 2007 at 20:11

Frank Field is spot on. I live in a low cost inner city neighbourhood, the kind of area where immigrants from all corners of the globe are settling. This impacts on schools, transport, waste services, doctors surgeries, housing, employment prospects and it has a downward affect on wages for the low paid. There is evidence to show that our society is zipping apart. If you live in a run down neighbourhood, you see it daily.

explodingbadger
23 October 2007 at 07:22

As far as I know there is NO such thing as an open door policy. Its very difficult to get a visa to live in the UK. EVEN if you are a refugee and it desprate need.

@Digger77

What exactly DO you see on a daily basis ? Maybe you do see people "from all corners of the globe" but how to you associate that with "our society is zipping apart."

or with "schools, transport, waste services" etc.

It is extremely sad to read such a far right article writen by a Labour MP. The Labour party has become a right wing party of business and I can see no difference between them and the Torys. The UK is the 5th largest economy in the world.

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/...

Why can't we deal with imigration ? Enough money is being paid in taxes. Well how about spending the money on the Iraq war on pulic services ? How about taxing the rich ? But no we will demonise imigrants again.

How can these people sleep at night ?

Luvster
18 November 2007 at 15:04

Actually, it is important that a debate is held on EU immigration - and that the issue is not hijacked by racists. I don't consider a debate on immigration is giving in to the far right.

I am not against immigration - it has important cultural, social and economic benefits. ( although economic benefits have been greatly overstated) It is about scale. The Polish govt estimates 1m Poles have moved here in the last 2 1/2 years. (hence why they were campaigning here recently) The population of the UK is expected to grow by 10 m in the next 13 years, and the impact on communities and services is huge.

I know from first hand experience, that there are sometimes 5 new Polish kids who turn up to one single class in a few months. This impacts directly on the Polish kids, and on the others in a classroom.

The sole use of the GDP is nonsensical. Based on that, you would be better off living in Mexico or Turkey than Switzerland. It is about GDP, per head of population - and concentration of wealth, and general standard of living. We have high unemployment, 25% of children living in poverty, and a serious skills issue - none of which are helped by large scale and sudden immigration. ( Clearly, there has to be a MUCH bigger focus to addressing these issues)

I don't believe in demonising immigrants - most are just looking for a better standard of living - but it is perfectly legitimate to impose a quota. Sadly, we appear to be too late...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Frank Field has been Labour MP for Birkenhead since 1979. From 1997 to 1998 he was Minister for Welfare Reform

Read More

Vote!

Should world leaders be forced to stay at the table until their plates are clean?

Win Manu Chao
Albums!

Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

Enter online