Registered user login:

Life on the inside

John Harris

Published 18 October 2007

House Music: the Oona King Diaries
Oona King Bloomsbury, 373pp, £12.99

It is not hard to think the worst of Oona King, the erstwhile east London MP whose defeat at the hands of George Galloway provided one of the 2005 election's more gripping subplots. She has a fondness for the kind of homespun wisdom that can easily irritate: "I am eternally grateful that my cup is half full because pessimism is so exhausting"; "I always help a stranger if I can - otherwise, what's the point of human existence?" Her vocabulary is littered with pseudo-street phrases - "check you later" springs to mind - that betray a very forced kind of grooviness. As evidenced by passages repeated so often that they become irksome, she also feels duty-bound to tell us that her Italian husband, Tiberio, is "beautiful": no less than "a vision of taut rippling muscles under dusky brown satin skin . . . he's gorgeous".

At her worst, her trademark is a mixture of faux-yoof and piety, as when she rather smugly writes about nuptials that ended at the London superclub Ministry of Sound, and a wedding list via which her and her husband's guests were obliged to make a donation to Amnesty International. The problem is, if a handful of factual slip-ups are anything to go by, that she is probably not quite as pop-culturally literate or tuned in to the global struggle as she would like to think. Blur's Alex James, at whose West End pad she spent the latter part of a very messy Millennium Eve, is their bassist not their drummer; Nelson Mandela did not spend all those years locked up in "Robbin Island". Not for nothing, you suspect, did one acquaintance recently sum her up as "a complete bullshitter".

A good deal of King's more unsympathetic side pours forth in this memoir's introduction, 50-odd breathlessly recounted pages that tumble through all kinds of themes, but never quite flesh out her choice of career; from the age of five, she "wanted to be prime minister", but you begin to wonder what exactly, aside from a fuzzily expressed interest in "social justice", pushed her into Labour politics. Just when her self- regarding prose is starting to grate, however, the book assumes its shape - that of a diary, albeit an apparently nipped, tucked and rewritten one - and, it rather pains me to say, becomes a surprisingly compelling read.

House Music is partly a book about the collision of the real world with the arcane and very male-centred ways of parliament - "a posh boarding school with crap food", as King elegantly puts it - and the almost impossible workload that comes with being an MP, particularly one who represents such a blighted constituency as Bethnal Green and Bow. For eight years, King's life revolved around 90-hour weeks, serial meetings and heartbreaking casework that could easily look futile. "The thing about being an MP in Tower Hamlets," she writes, "is that if you are successful in a case, it only leads to more cases, because people who are very, very poor are only ever out of the shit for a certain amount of time."

Better still - and given King's one-time reputation for being new Labour incarnate, some may find this surprising - she drills into the doublethink and brutality that sat at the heart of the Blair government. The single best scene in the book is the occasion in 1999 when King was summarily called in for a very twitchy audience with Blair, his political secretary Sally Morgan and Alastair Campbell, and asked to write a damning newspaper piece about Ken Livingstone, then deemed a potential "disaster for London". Picked, with truly mind-boggling logic, because she was seen as being "independent-minded", she turned them down and thereby sealed her fate: as if to prove his malign grip on Labour machinations, Campbell told her she had thereby screwed up her chances of promotion for at least five years.

So, it is somewhat tragic that King's undoing was bound up with the episode that also damned Blair. When it comes to Iraq, her arguments in favour of her pro-war vote in the Commons still seem as contorted as they were circa 2003 - she claims to have supported the invasion on an "anti-genocide" basis, but also sketches out a "best-case" scenario in which Saddam Hussein would have given unconditional access to UN inspectors, been "disarmed" and left in power. However, all this began to reach its denouement while she was in the midst of the IVF treatment that provides her story's biggest human-interest angle (and, it has to be said, the likely reason for her book deal). It rendered her skint - and, as she and Tiberio were plunged into a demi-monde of sperm samples, embryo implantations and dashed hopes, emotionally derelict. Cue the arrival of a weird alliance of Islamic hardliners and Trotskyites, set on evicting her from her seat. Even if you cleave to the opinion that she deserved to lose, it all lends her tale a pretty heartbreaking aspect.

Along the way, there is a lot of profanity. In keeping with her all-pervading gaucheness, King does not tend to swear well, but just occasionally, she hits the spot, as on page 306, when one outburst nails House Music's essential point: that a parliamentary career leaves no room for life, and politics is therefore all the poorer. "Today, MPs voted to partially revoke the modernisation changes to working hours," she writes. "Stupid wankers."

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

AthenaM
18 October 2007 at 15:55

Islamic hardliners? What, Muslims opposed to the war you mean? The 'Islamic hardliners' were those threatening both King and Galloway for trying to get Muslims to vote, and putting a sentence of death on Galloway while holding him hostage - but let's not worry about facts when we're writing an article for a mainstream magazine - heaven forbid that the reactionary nonsense could be left out, even once!

Leaving aside that particularly annoying and tyically nonsensical sentence in your article...

Oona King is indeed very dislikeable and dishonest. A documentary was on the other night 'Oona and Me' made by a friend of hers, and even her friend could not put her in a good light.

She mentioned how 'extreme' the (2005) election campaign was and yet this was the woman that voted for the ultimate in 'extreme' - the invasion of a devastated country (whose people had already died in their millions through war and sanctions) that would ultimately lead to the deaths of another million people in four years.

Her reasoning was Orwellian - she voted for war to 'prevent genocide'.

Not only is war obviously not the best way to 'prevent genocide' and the quickest way to extend it, she fails to acknowledge that the genocide to which she referred (US/UK sanctions) was being carried out by the exact same people that were about to invade anyway.

Her parents featured in the documentary and they came across as beautiful, compassionate people - her dad was a US civil rights activist who opposed the war on Iraq, her mother an activist for social justice and also opposed to the war on Iraq.

What on earth must they make of their daughter's support of the most extreme and dangerous administration the US has ever seen? How did the daughter of such wonderful people turn out to be a careerist and a warmonger?

She denies the charge of 'careerist' and yet every single vote she ever took in Parliament was one that Blair would be happy with (yes to student fees, foundation hospitals, war etc)

Sadly, this woman has learnt no lessons from her wonderfully principled parents.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?