Registered user login:

Pakistan: the ex-PMs' roadshow

Rageh Omaar

Published 13 September 2007

Rageh Omaar reports on the political upheavals or otherwise that took place when Nawaz Sharif attempted his return from exile

I flew into Islamabad airport the day before the airplane carrying Pakistan's deposed prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, was due to touch down. For two weeks previously, TV and the print media on both sides of the Atlantic and here in Pakistan had been giving the strong impression that the return of the exiled former prime minister would be a tumultuous and defining moment in Pakistani politics. It was billed as a showdown between a civilian politician and the military ruler, General Pervez Musharraf, who had deposed him. The outcome would determine the future of the Pakistani state, without which the so-called war on terror would be fatally undermined.

That's not the impression you get in Islamabad. There was very little to suggest a security and police presence at the airport and there was little sign of Sharif's supporters and party activists, who only turned up in modest numbers the next day. In the city itself, just a few posters hailing his return could be spotted on lamp posts and in open spaces. The political reality on the streets of Pakistan's cities was very different from the news coverage. The significance of Sharif's return lay in how General Musharraf would react to it.

The Pakistani president is a man besieged by challenges from many quarters and the return of his two key exiled civilian opponents, Sharif and Benazir Bhutto, are only symptomatic of his waning authority. Barely four months ago it would have been inconceivable for Sharif and Bhutto to have insisted on returning from exile in London, or that Pakistan's supreme court would have ruled they be allowed to do so. But that was before Musharraf's catastrophic decision to launch a full-scale military assault on the Red Mosque, the most symbolic madrasa for conservative and militant Islamist opposition movements. The battle for the Red Mosque in Islamabad in July was the real breaking point in Pakistani politics, because of the enormous damage it did to Musharraf.

The idea that the choice now facing Pakistan is between a civilian-led government and military rule is erroneous. That was certainly true before July. But what happened at the Red Mosque revealed a far more profound struggle at the heart of Pakistani politics and national identity: a struggle between a wealthy and largely urban middle-class elite, which controls a state built on secular western-style institutions (whether that be the army, commerce, industry and the media), and a large majority of the poor, religiously conservative and predominantly rural population, who live in tribal and feudal communities and believe the government has failed them.

The Pakistani state has consciously radicalised the religious institutions on which the country's rural population has depended for guidance and education - namely the madrasas. This radicalisation took place under the noses and with the active participation of the American and British governments in the 1980s, in order to provide volunteers for the war in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union. And what was an important channel for this radicalisation? The Red Mosque.

In the northern tribal areas of Pakistan, from where I am writing this article, there is an almost complete lack of interest in Nawaz Sharif. No one I spoke to on the day of his brief return, before being deported to Saudi Arabia, had much to say about it. A group of men I spoke to in the main market of Peshawar pulled me aside and urged me as a journalist to come to their home village in Waziristan. "There is conflict and upheaval there," one of them said, "the schools are shut, the military are acting like occupiers. Life is horrible for ordinary people."

He is right. You may not see it on the evening news but there is a civil conflict in parts of Pakistan's tribal areas between religiously conservative tribal communities and the Pakistani army. At the time of writing, 300 Pakistani soldiers are being held hostage.

There will be much more in the western media over the coming months about the challenge to President Musharraf from his civilian political opponents. But the real struggle - for the national identity of Pakistan - will transcend individual political moments such as the return of exiled politicians with dubious track records.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Sharif
13 September 2007 at 14:10

Rageh Omaar: Nothing what you state is incorrect; in fact you have put it mildly. But in dictatorship where most of the rights of opposition are curtailed and the rule of law is in fact rule of one man in uniform , you do not expect anything different. When the supreme court made the verdict that Nawaz Sharif has a right to return to the country, Musharaf said that he will respect the decision. That is not what happened. He was packed and sent to Saudi Arabia. I am no friend of Nawaz, since he is the one who passed the sharia laws during his tenure, he was also the one whose followers attacked Supreme court ; he was also responsible of sending Najam Sethi, the editor of Friday Times and Daily Times to prison. But, Musharaf is a military dictator and the rule of law must take course. Majority of Pakistanis want a return to civilian rule and free elections. Musharaf and other dictators have done enough damage. Democracy produces muggins sometimes, but that is no reason to ditch it. A democratic and liberal Pakistan can help stop this carnage of religious intolerance.

omarali50
13 September 2007 at 15:30

it is good that Rageh Omar has at least chosen to talk to some people IN pakistan rather than spinning tall tales from afar, but his description of the divide between the elite and the masses is partly inaccurate. There are several large divisions, not one. Clearly, the mass of people in the tribal areas is opposed to the westernized elite and the American funded army and would prefer to live in a shariah-based state...their independence is already a fact and I doubt if the army can retake the Islamic Emirate of Waziristan even if it tries. In Balochistan, the local Baloch population is being overwhelmed by the army and settlers but they may have a harder time achieving independence because their numbers are so small. But in Punjab and Sindh, large majorities would still prefer to live in a semi-modern state, ruled by corrupt but moderately responsive and inclusive mainstream parties like the PPP and the PML. support for Shariah based talibanism is still relatively low. The problem there is that the minimal requirements of a modern state cannot be met under "one man rule". Even dictatoships need the mandate of heaven and Musharraf's incompetent and lawless dictatorship has long since lost that mandate. A transition to civilian rule is still possible, but he is not going to go easy, so the whole corrupt structure may break down rather than evolve...we will have to see.

Sharif
13 September 2007 at 17:53

omarali50: your analysis is 100% right. I am beginning to wonder if the transition to civilian rule is going to work. I say let an imperfect democracy take root. Dictators rule for decades and if civilian is allowed to rule that long and unhindered, he or she can deliver, hopefully.

Sharif

Amil Khan
13 September 2007 at 18:55

Pakistan has had plenty of imperfect democracy. Besides, the Muslim world has plenty of examples of imperfect democracy, and they arent going anywhere fast.

And, there isnt anything mainstream about PPP or PML-N. Pakistan's ruling elites - whether military, feudal or industrial - often display a breaktaking disregard and contempt for ordinary Pakistanis. lots of senior officials talk privately about the "uneducated" as if 90 percent of the country needs get on with shutting up and providing cheap labour.

the problem it seems, if youre wealthy, is when the masses get involved in the sport-poltics of the elites. traditionally, the demands of the poor, often voiced through islamist politics, was adopted by one of the big political players. Nawaz Shaerif looks like he's playing that same game. but the rules have changed since his pre-hair plug days and those same "unper" villagers are not going to be as easy to buy off as they were back in the day.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the third runway at Heathrow go ahead?