Registered user login:

A toff and proud of it

Clarissa Dickson-Wright

Published 17 August 2007

TV chef and countryside campaigner Clarissa Dickson-Wright kicks off a series of articles looking at the issue of class and poshness in 2007


Despite having been rigorously taught never to assume I had fallen into that trap with the word 'toff', believing, as most people do, that it was a negative description derived from the term 'toffee nosed' i.e. someone grand and snooty with their nose stuck in the air to avoid smelling the odours of the masses.

I have cause to be grateful to the New Statesman as, in order to understand the word better, I was driven to the pages of Cassell's Dictionary of Slang.

Toff, this tome reveals, is an early 19th century word meaning an aristocrat and by the mid 19th century had come to mean a generous benefactor.

'You're a toff sir', was a compliment - an acknowledgement of thanks for a favour received. Do not be misled in thinking this has anything to do with 'toffee-nosed', I read , this is a 1940's expression so that chronologically 'toff' cannot be a derivation.

That toff has now become a derogatory term is one of those curious quirks of the English language but there can be no doubt than in modern terminology it is not intended to be a pleasantry.

It is a phrase beloved of the media and is used, as is common to the tabloids, with no consistency in its application.

For example David Cameron is frequently referred to as a toff, true he did go to Eton and Oxford and even though he has lived for years at the less fashionable end of Ladbroke Grove and was formerly employed in media relations, not an obvious profession for toffs, he may well qualify.

Then why not Tony Blair who was educated at Fettes (often referred to as the Eton of Scotland) and Oxford, is a qualified barrister and owns a house in the much more up market area of Connaught square? The square even boasts its own hunt 'the Connaught Square Squirrel Hunt' though I have yet to receive confirmation that our Tone has joined.

During the Two Fat Ladies years Jennifer and I were frequently referred to as toffs, rather mysteriously I thought, as I am a child of the professional middle-classes.

Doctors of medicine on one side and mining engineers on the other. No land owning aristocrats in sight and Jennifer was the product of a Dundee Jute family 'Trade,my dear,' as she would have put it.

Neither of us was rich or even owned a house & we had both worked for years as 'cooks' & even, in that capacity, as domestic servants. I decided that it must refer to our accents, we were both educated privately & spoke with the clear precise tones of the upper-middle classes but then so of course does Tony Blair.

Maybe it is a question of politics. One can not be a toff and a socialist perhaps? Then of course one must remember Tony is not a socialist so the mystery continues.

The English class system is something of a curiosity and it doesn't matter how many prime ministers declare that it no longer exists, it is rooted like ground elder under the stones of our very existence.

It is an upward sliding scale,if you make enough money you can join,your children will go to public schools and if the money hasnt been squandered by the third generation your descendents will be toffs.

It is even a sought after status. I remember the wife of a very successful self-made man, who had gone from grandson of an agricutural labourer & son of a smallholder to multi millionaire. She wistfully listened to Johnny Scott (my co-star in the TV series Clarissa and the Countryman) and remarked 'wouldn't it be lovely if our grandchildren spoke like that?'.

Maybe outside the media the 19th century interpretation of 'toff' remains. It would seem however that the scale cannot slide downwards.

I remember that aged forty; a single female; an orphan; latterly amployed as a servant; newly recovereing from alcoholism and destitute, I was told by the Housing Authorities that they were not there for the likes of me and that I should go and get a job. I am enduringly grateful to them for this and wish they said it to more people but presumably it was because of my toff accent.

There was an occasion when I was appearing on the Clive Anderson chatshow when I was attacked by a Labour MP as a toff. There was no doubt in my mind that I had spent more of my life getting my hands dirty and working till my feet ached than this freeloader on the nation's bounty.

I demanded to know how, as a fat cook, I could be a toff and eventually he backed down. In an era when the term 'working class' seems more and more to refer to people on the dole I find myself completely at a loss to identify why this epithet should be hurdled at someone like myself who works incredibly hard.

Perhaps the biggest example of the word's misuse was over the Hunting Act, vaunted as a statute against animal cruelty and wasting many hours of Parliamentary time and money, it was eventually passed via the Parliament Act.

The MP's then stated that it had nothing to do with the fox, deer or hare but was a blow against toffs & was all about class. This showed two things clearly, firstly that the MP's had never bothered to go hunting or coursing - the most egalitarian of country pursuits and, secondly, that the class system is alive, well and living in Westminister on the benches of the Labour Party.

Having written this I have decided to accept the label, to regard it strictly in the mid 19th century term and to ask all those regardless of race, creed, colour or class who see themselves as trying to stand up for their principles & benefit the world to proudly bear the epithet TOFF.

Clarissa Dickson-Wright's autobiography, Spilling the Beans, is due to be published on 6 September by Hodder & Stoughton, £18.99

Read more from our series looking at the issue of class and 'poshness'

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

Tom Paine
17 August 2007 at 17:04

Class war waged by democratically elected MPs who voted for a hunting ban! That's a laugh! Didn't you see the behaviour of the yobs in tweeds who descended on London time after time. Running hounds through Parliament Square, holding up traffic, assaulting the police! You people didn't give a toss when hundreds of thousands lost their jobs in heavy industry in the eighties and nineties but my god the outrage over your beloved hobby! You're talking about a breed of truly ghastly people who think they are above the law!

angrywelshman
17 August 2007 at 17:06

What the hell is this woman doing on this website? For god's sake!

MrR
17 August 2007 at 17:31

This is actually a very good article, a bit too meadering for my usual taste, but the underlying question is clear: What does it mean to be 'working-class' and what does it mean to be any other sort of class you'd care to mention.

What the previous posts do,probably by accident, is mistake 2007 for being the 1980s. It's a different world in the UK now and if we are going to use terms like working class and toffs we'd better be sure what we mean by them!

MarkBin
18 August 2007 at 01:48

Tom Paine, of course if they had been yobs in khakis campaigning against capitalism and climate change (whom I would support by the way) you probably wouldn't have an issue with them. And what's the fact that people who go hunting didn't protest against the shutdown of heavy industry got to do with anything? It's a really childish, tit-for-tat approach to take. It's also extremely cliched. You should look at the majority of people who go hunting. That they didn't protest against heavy industry closures is probably more to do with the fact that they were too busy eeking out a living working 14 hours a day on the land to put food on your table.

angrywelshman, do you understand the concept of pluralism?

adfero affero
20 August 2007 at 16:26

Oh dear, accent and class: a minefield.

It always puzzles me why Tony Blair is considered posh by so many people: with the shu-er (sure) and all those -tud endings (started becomes start-ud; wasted: wast-ud) he's clearly a hybrid. Gilian Shepherd, M.P., is a -tuder too, though well spoken enough to be middle-class of some sort or other.

On the other hand it would be forgivable if you mistook Clarissa for a member of the aristocracy. But mis-classify her if you were of her class, would you? No. You'd know her parents or been to school with her brother.

Colonel Blimp
21 August 2007 at 16:25

Clarissa Dickson-Wright, you're the gal for me!

PeterHCT
21 August 2007 at 18:27

Enjoyed the article. Was the ban on hunting all about class? Well, my wife was on a 'course' with a then unemployed union official, who conceded that logically, if reduction in cruelty was the aim, the first target would be angling, but this would clash with the members' interests, but hunting had no such support.

Still seems to go on,anyway.

Out of mild curiosity, who exactly feels entitled to award themselves Tom Paine as a nom-de-net? Perhaps I should have gone for Captain Swing?

chris37uk
22 August 2007 at 12:51

Dickson Wrights insults the majority of the UK public who supported and still support the ban on hunting.

I suppose she thinks Ann Widdecombe, Patrick Moore and the late Alan Clark MP are all 'class war' advocates?? They are all people who supported the ban.

Chasing and killin animals for so called sport has no place in a civilised society thats why it was banned.

Despite what extremists like Wright, Kate Hoey and other backward relics would have people believe.

PeterHCT
22 August 2007 at 21:42

"Chasing and killin animals for so called sport has no place in a civilised society thats why it was banned", writes chris37uk.

Seems to be a case of defining 'civilised' as 'excluding that which I disapprove of'. All very well as a value-judgement, but in essence an imposition of chris37uk's world-view. In terms of reducing the suffering caused, why hunting rather than hitting foxen with motor-cars [1] or angling? Or indeed using the parliamentary time to legislate on ageism earlier than was the case?

[1] Makes Gawdalmighty metallic thump.

Julian Blackwell
25 August 2007 at 12:21

If you doubt the 'Civilised' nature of the hunting fraternity and their followers just check out the videos on youtube under 'FoxHunting'

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the third runway at Heathrow go ahead?