Registered user login:

Land of the old general

Ben Davies

Published 16 August 2007

Visiting Paraguay, Ben Davies finds a decaying country that still bears the scars of dictatorship

As I sat in a crumbling, empty hotel in Asunción, it was hard to imagine a good reason for coming to Paraguay unless one was a fleeing Nazi or fancied a career in smuggling. I gazed at the city from the panoramic terrace by the pool, which had long since ceased to be cared for. It looked utterly unappealing in the pouring rain.

Days earlier, I had crossed from Argentina, nearly 40 years after Graham Greene entered the country. He came looking for something "exotic and dangerous" - somewhere to base the closing chapters of Travels With My Aunt. Later, he wrote about his trip up the River Paraná and how he found a country still in the iron grip of General Alfredo Stroessner, a brutal dictator of German extraction who held power from 1954 until a coup in 1989. Greene described a place of considerable attraction: few cars, bountiful fruit trees and zero personal income tax. But he questioned whether he could ignore the stories of torture, detention and murder just to live in an old colonial house surrounded by servants for a few pounds a month.

In the time since it parted company with Stroessner, Paraguay has been far from stable: a vice-president assassinated, the last president tried and jailed on corruption charges, his predecessor forced to resign, and an attempted coup. The current leader, Nicanor Duarte Frutos, came to power in August 2003 pledging to root out corruption, yet Paraguay is still ranked among the most corrupt of countries. It is, to put it mildly, a basket case of a place. Perhaps that in itself is reason enough to come and take a look today, just as it was in 1969.

The general's long rule can be explained by his brutality and by his having allowed his henchmen free rein to smuggle what they liked into the country. In the process, many of them acquired large personal fortunes. Greene wrote that, after agriculture, smuggling was the country's chief industry. Today, in Stroessner's home town of Encarnación, on the border with Argentina, there is evidence everywhere of counterfeit and smuggled goods. A constant stream of hawkers goes from bar to bar selling dodgy electrical items and fearsome-looking flick knives. Violence and aggression are just beneath the surface, as young men parade noisily around the city in powerful, expensive vehicles. There are numerous gun shops - perhaps this accounts for the heavy armed presence outside the town's banks.

Paraguay's population is largely indigenous and poor. Those Europeans who moved here often came because they were fleeing persecution or prosecution. Some were trying to create new societies - religious, political, or, in the case of Friedrich Nietzsche's sister, Aryan. Others were just very badly informed. Around Encarnación, the German presence is particularly strong, with a number of colonies, and many of them were already long established when Nazi war criminals such as Josef Mengele sought refuge in the country.

Greene wrote of Israeli spies coming and failing to penetrate these close-knit communities, whose members were averse to "making trouble". In San Bernardino, a pleasant lakeside town not far from the capital, Asunción, the teenagers speak a strange hybrid of Spanish and German. When I arrived and asked for directions, an old man well into his eighties demanded, from the top of his horse: "Sprechen sie Deutsch?" When he learned that I was British, he turned and refused to say another word. That evening at dinner, I met other exiles, such as the French stockbroker, raised in England, who said that in Paraguay he lived "like an aristocrat", with servants, a chauffeur and a second home. His family asked about property prices in London and laughed with horror when told the average price of a flat. In Paraguay, £250,000 would build you Buckingham Palace, they said. The restaurant was run by a Portuguese woman and her husband, another Frenchman, who had apparently stayed in the country after being ripped off in a business deal.

Of course, in some respects the capital city has changed since Greene's visit. Enough time has lapsed since 1969 - when he noted a solitary skyscraper - for more to be built and then decay. Black mould creeps up the buildings in this humid place and no one has enough cash or cares enough to clean them. As in Encarnación, there are guns and guards everywhere. At the Museum of Independence, an armed man in uniform joined my guided tour - and listened closely as I was told that corruption in Paraguay had come about only because of dealings with the outside world. Outside the presidential palace, I was quickly jostled away by a man wielding an automatic weapon. He and his colleagues seemed to be expecting something to happen.

By the river, where Greene got his first glimpse of Asunción and where the huge, new parliament building now sits, a police vehicle armed with water cannon was parked. Behind it, half clinging to the city and half sinking into the marshes, was the capital city's largest shanty town, La Chacarita, which is flooded at least once each year. There is little to see or do in the centre of town; at night, the few bars offer karaoke. Prostitutes stand on many of the street corners. The "rich" live in the suburbs in huge, hideous, pillared houses with carriage driveways and high fences.

Greene observed that, in Paraguay, there is little respect for human life. "All along the road to Encarnación . . . are little signs and crosses to the dead," he wrote. And only some were accidents. In contemporary Asunción, the front page of a tabloid paper showed the picture of a mother, her arms outstretched. "I killed my children with these hands," screamed the headline. On the inside pages was a picture of a weeping father and two infants in their coffins.

During that evening in San Bernardino, I asked the French stockbroker where to go in Paraguay. He seemed at a loss, saying the "super-rich" holidayed on the beaches of Uruguay. It was not the first time I had been pointed to another country when asking for recommendations about where to go in Paraguay. A travel agent in Encarnación had studied a map of the country with me and denounced almost every place as "dangerous". He suggested a trip to Brazil. A week later, on that rainy day in an Asunción, no further persuasion was needed. I caught the first bus back across the border.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

40 comments from readers

andyespo
16 August 2007 at 16:52

I have traveled extensivley in Paraguay. Stay off the highways after dark. They are indeed dangerous due to intoxicated and risk-taking drivers, as well as the cows and horses that allowed to roam free. Stay away from certain parts of town late at night as you would any large city and you will be fine. The Jesuit ruins in the southern part of the country are very interesting and there is great fishing around the city of Ayolas in the Misiones area.

Colonel Blimp
16 August 2007 at 17:48

Prostitutes on many street corners, eh? Bless my soul.

Dan1elle
16 August 2007 at 18:09

Thank you for so completely disregarding a country that I adore. I prefer that no one discover the charm of relaxing on a porch swing in the countryside, sipping mate while listening to the neighbors strumming tunes on their handmade guitars and harps after a long day in the fields. Paraguay is filled with kind hearted souls who are generous and funny. The poorest of the poor will gladly share their cornbread with strangers, while telling 500 year old tales of mythical figures. Really, where else in the world can you sit for hours drinking tea with a complete stranger and feel as welcome as family? I prefer that Paraguay remain "undiscovered" to those who can't appreciate the natural beauty and genuine kindness offered by this country and its people.

Meri
18 August 2007 at 12:16

One of the worst articles I have ever read. Can't believe you went all the way there to write something like this. It completely lacks content and perspective and mixes opinion and a few historic facts. It just tells readers about your inability to engage with a context that doesn't offer you a tourist attraction and says absolutely nothing about the culture and the place that you somehow managed to miss out completely.The experiences you had are unrelated to that specific context, as a Paraguayan I could meet an unfriendly person here in London. 'Paraguay's population is largely indigenous and poor'???; a two minute research on the internet tells me that ethnically, Paraguay has one of the most homogenous populations in South America, about 91% are Mestizos, Spaniards and Guaranies and that less than 3% of the national population are from 17 different ethnic indigenous. What are you writing about???

terere
20 August 2007 at 01:23

This article only points out negative aspects of my country, excluding Paraguay`s good aspects. Doesn`t very country have ugly things to show? Is Britain the perfect country where people are friendly, will offer you Terere? Is it a country where you can explore its beautiful Dry Forest in the Chaco Region? Or explore the Pantanal? Does it have the mighty Jaguar? The Jesuit ruins? The huge Itaipu & Yacyreta Dams? The sweet sounds of the Guarani language? The historical sites of the Triple Alliance`s Battles? This absurd war from which Paraguay has never recovered & was financed by which European Country??!!

terere
20 August 2007 at 01:25

This article only points out negative aspects of my country, excluding Paraguay`s good aspects. Doesn`t very country have ugly things to show? Is the UK the perfect country where people are friendly, will offer you Terere? Is it a country where you can explore its beautiful Dry Forest in the Chaco Region? Or explore the Pantanal? Does it have the mighty Jaguar? The Jesuit ruins? The huge Itaipu & Yacyreta Dams? The sweet sounds of the Guarani language? The historical sites of the Triple Alliance`s Battles? This absurd war from which Paraguay has never recovered & was financed by which European Country??!! Make a lucky guess..

MichaelBurns
20 August 2007 at 16:13

I have lived in Paraguay, off and on, for half of the last 30 years, and while what Mr. Davies writes is true, it is only part of the picture. The portrait Dan1elle paints is part of the other side. Paraguay is a country of sweet and kind people who have had one of the world's most tragic histories thrust upon them, usually by their own governments - governments they have rarely been able to choose by democratic means.

All in all, Mr. Davies' article shows that a short visit is not enough time to see a country truly. That seems to be a lesson many journalists need to learn, and not only in regards to Paraguay.

Ben Davies
21 August 2007 at 16:50

I think Michael Burns makes a fair point. It isn't possible to learn about a country in a week or 10 days. But then someone holidaying wouldn't exactly have six months or a year. The piece I wrote on my trip to Paraguay was really intended to convey the impressions I gained as I travelled through the country over a 10 day period. If the impression I gave was unfair then I am sorry. If you take the capital alone, most countries' key city is something of a showcase - the description I gave of downtown Asunción was, I feel accurate. Contrary to what Meri implies, I didn't go to Paraguay with an agenda and, actually, I'm not interested in the typical 'tourist attraction'. Most of all I was shocked by the effect of decades of misrule by the Colorados and some of the obvious poverty and neglect. Inevitably that came through in what I wrote.

Y Aubrey
22 August 2007 at 10:04

It is hard to believe that the author spent more than 48 hours in Paraguay as there are, unfortunately, not many insights into the country or its people. And, I’d have to agree with Mr. Burns, about the article painting an awfully one-sided picture of Paraguay. Having lived there myself for many years, I could not direct anyone, for instance, to one of the “numerous gun shops” that Mr. Davies seems to have discovered during his stay there, and the “violence and aggression” in Paraguayan towns is not more or less latent than what one would encounter in many a British town late on a Friday night… (BTW, wasn’t Britain just named the most violent country in the developed world with knife crime being a huge issue not only in the streets but even among primary school kids!).

I would also have to disagree with Mr. Davies on his very matter-of-fact assertion that Paraguay is “largely indigenous and poor”, as although poverty is undoubtedly a problem, it is by no means as pervasive as the article would lead one to believe. While in terms of ethnicity, Paraguay has a very mixed population (probably the most mixed in Latin America) that includes not only European, but also some Middle Eastern and East Asian components. The “indigeneous” population is unfortunately a tiny minority that has managed to survive not only the Spanish conquest, but also two of the most brutal wars of the continent during the last 150 years. Indeed, as Paraguay’s population was very nearly wiped out during the Triple Alliance war in the 1860s, few Paraguayans can trace their origins back to Paraguay for more than 100 years.

On the other hand, the traces of successive bad governments are also apparent for anyone to see and have a lot to blame for the state of disrepair of downtown Asuncion (a project to re-generate the town centre has been on hold at parliament for over a decade!). It is also certainly true that Paraguay is a country that is not used to receiving tourists (in spite of being extremely welcoming to foreigners) and its travel agents -trained primarily to take Paraguayans abroad to visit foreign tourist attractions- should indeed learn more about some of the wonderful things to see and do there.

Should Mr. Davies decide to give Paraguay a (second?) chance, he should make sure to visit the Jesuit ruins in the south of the country or Sapucai (a town a couple of hour away from Asuncion that used to be known as the “English village” as it housed British engineers and their families that were there in the 1850s building setting up the steam railway). He should perhaps also visit one of the numerous national parks where he would have access to spectacular nature with some wonderful bird-spotting and water sports opportunities. Or perhaps, he should simply visit Concepcion in the north of the country or Villarica by the hilly Cordillera, where the easy pace of life, good food and kind people are normally enough to make anyone’s stay a pleasurable one. And last but not least, do make sure to choose a better hotel next time around (as there are certainly a few very pleasant hotels in Asuncion)!

educ2
22 August 2007 at 15:53

Obviously this article was written by some one who sees Paraguay trough “gringos” eyes. If you want to know a place in deep stay some time there and interact with average people; not in rooftop of your hotel drinking a beer.

Robert Munro
23 August 2007 at 12:49

It is sad to see that Mr Davies, who describes himself as a trained journalist has totally failed to see the real Paraguay. A minimum amount of research would have revealed a country full of natural beauty, populated by some of the kindest, most generous people in the world. A nation proud of its history. I go to Paraguay every year for six weeks in October and November and had Mr. Davies allowed me to show him the country, he could have written a very different article, but there again would a newspaper had bothered to publish it?

Incredulous Paraguayan
23 August 2007 at 20:49

I was appalled by this article. To say it lacks balance and objectivity is an understatement. I cannot understand how it could have been published in a serious periodical. It might as well be titled "Let's bash Paraguay for the .... of it".

Furthermore, the author should have done some more homework. His assertion that "Paraguay's population is largely indigenous..." is simply false. Paraguay is about 95% mestizo.

Crumbling hotels can certainly be found in Paraguay, as in many places. Next time, the author might want to spend a little more and stay at the Sheraton (not far from the airport), or at one of several other hotels that most world travelers would find suitable. Just a comment in case he wants to return and conduct his research more thoroughly.

gabyte
24 August 2007 at 10:19

I really feel for Mr Davies, you obviously were not lucky at all! to go all the way to Paraguay, so many hours flying, and then not being able to enjoy it!! Paraguay is a beautiful country with incredible hospitable people. A country that is still maintaining its culture and where 'family life' is a real thing! Next time you go you let me know and I'll draw a list for you with things to do and not to do!

Robert Powell
24 August 2007 at 14:29

No I can confirm Paraguay really is a hellhole.

Molly Jackson
24 August 2007 at 14:36

No hellhole isn't right. It's arsehole! Paraguay is the arsehole of South America. The people who are commenting here are just being unrealistic. they no doubt think inhabit a model nation. Shame it's not a working model.

Colonel Blimp
24 August 2007 at 14:48

Did you realise the oldest working prostitute in the Kings Cross area is in her seventies?

TURISTA PA' SIEMPRE
24 August 2007 at 18:12

PARAGUAYRULZ I DO NOT AGREE WITH YOU AT ALL!!! I HAVE BEEN HERE IN PARAGUAY FOR THREE MONTHS NOW AND I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!! I HAVE FOUND SOME GOOD PEOPLE AND I ALSO HAVE FOUND SOME PEOPLE THAT IS NOT SO GOOD, IT IS LIKE EVERYWHERE YOU GO, THE COMMENT ABOUT THE GRINGO'S HEY EVERYGRINGO IS NOT THE SAME BROTHER, YOU GENERALIZING JUST LIKE THE JOURNALIST DID, YOU ARE AS IGNORANT AS HE IS!!! BROTHER I LOVE THIS COUNTRY, THE PEOPLE, THE FOOD, THE NIGHT LIFE, EVERYTHING BROTHER, DO NOT LET A DUMB JOURNALIST MAKE YOU GENERALIZE LIKE YOU ARE DOING, IN ONE THING I AGREE WITH YOU; HERE YOU CAN FIND TRUE FRIENDS, I AM NOT A GRINGO BUT I LIVE THERE AND PEOPLE OVERTHERE IS THE SAME WAY, SOME ARE COOL AND SOME ARE NOT SO COOL, PARAGUAY I LOVE YOU!!!

Colonel Blimp
24 August 2007 at 18:38

I mean how can you compete with that kind of experience.

Graci-
24 August 2007 at 20:13

Paraguay has a lot of political issues, has a lot of economic problems, there is also poverty but in no way it could be compared with places like Brazil. It’s also a place that was massively destroyed by two wars so the old downtown is poorly preserved, but you can’t judge its night life since only 15 minutes from this old town there are lots of great nice clubs. There are also malls and nice shops and great places to eat during the day. I can’t understand how these businesses would survive if we were all pour and had no turists at all.

I have also never seen a gun shop arround and I live here for 10 years. Of course there are armed guards at the Presidential house, have you seen the White House in USA? By the way, many times I live my car opened, and sleep with my doors openned.

And regarding to hotels, for only 40 dollars 2 people can stay in a 4 star hotel with swimming pool, air conditioning, individual bathroom and a lot of other facilities. With this same amount of money you would probably be able to afford a second class hostel in London, sharing your bedroom and bathroom with 6 more people and yet would have to bring your on sheets. So I wonder how much did he paid at his hotel.

I fell very safe walking in Asuncion streets, and I have never heard of an unarmed Brazilian guy being shot but a Paraguayan Special police with 6 shots by “mistake”, so the insecurity is very discussible.

By the way, when we write about other countries we should really try to understand their cultures, because I think it’s disgusting to eat French fries held into newspapers, or not showering every day, but yet I respect it if it’s someone else’s cultures.

I could go on and on but I think the writer has probably a problem with German an French citizens too, so I will just assume he is a very narrow-minded guy with lack of capability to adapt himself to other environments. By the way, I will give him a hint, for the next time you want to visit another country, please google a little, search in the internet, so you will have more chance to enjoy your trips. It’s really hard to get to know London if I just arrive at the city without knowing what kind of places you should visit and where you should stay or eat.. Please, don’t travel any more.. the international world is not made for intolerants.

J Cavanna
25 August 2007 at 21:22

If this was a serious travel article, I will have to be careful not to waste any more time on Ben Davies's writings; neither any travel section in the New Statesman, there does not seem to be any editorial control on their writers.

I have been visiting Paraguay since 1945, things are much the same as then other than a few metaled roads, bus services that cover the country and a few high rise buildings in the capital.

The country may be very poor, but it is generally safe to live in, and more to the point safe for visitors even when they write such uncomplimentory "reports", no doubt Ben Davied would find no trouble in a return visit; if it was as dangerous as he made out to be, he would not dare to return.

There are normal reliable sources to obtain travel facts, the editor would be better employed by scruternising the efforts of such amateur writers.

dul
27 August 2007 at 16:02

what a waste of time and money! "I caught the first bus back across the border" what are you?? a girl?? come on... you might stay at home if you cant see beyond things.

verabed
30 August 2007 at 21:56

This is the most disrespectful and despicable article I have ever read in my whole life. Yes, Paraguay is a poor country, the poorer in the region. Let me enlighten you on the reasons behind this poverty: Paraguay used to be the most advanced and rich country in the whole of South America, until 1864, when three countries (yes, three: Argentina. Brazil and Uruguay) destroyed the whole country in the infamous Triple Alliance War. Now, guess who financed and encouraged this war? The British Empire, my friends…

Manuel Cortez
02 September 2007 at 11:46

No, no. Paraguay really is a fantastic country full of friendly people. These friendly people welcomed fleeing war criminals to live among them - still does it would seem. These friendly people who, no matter how rich they are, still don't really pay income tax leaving the poor to eke out a living on the fringes. These friendly people who - if they are rich - live off the benefits of smuggling and corruption. These friendly people who provide a haven for any number of criminals and rotten individuals. Still live in your shopping malls and behind your walled gardens and believe you have created a great nation if you wish. I won't. Most of my family had to flee you friendly people and your country because we were being persecuted for the political activities of my uncle. Wake up to the hell you have created!

pollito
04 September 2007 at 15:30

I was shoked to read your article, because it tells only part of the picture, and some assertions are completely inaccurate. These were noted by other readers.

You could have visited the Jesuitics Ruins, just a few minutes from Encarnación, and also meet local people, especially in the countryside.

If you needed ice for your tereré and they don´t have it at their home they would go here and there to their neighbours to get it for you. They would also generously ask you to stay at their house and they´d sleep on the floor to lend you their bed.

marceloramospy
07 September 2007 at 18:36

Es extremadamente aberrante que usted como "periodista" escriba algo tan humillante a tan grande nacion como lo es EL PARAGUAY. De hecho no se debe dar tanta importancia a lo que todos estos ingleses, gringos, españoles y algunos cuantos mas (paises imperialistas que lo unico que buscan es su posicion respecto del mundo) mencionan en sus articulos. Claro, tuvieron la suerte de que su pais haya sido una potencia mundial con el solo hecho de invadir naciones con la fuerza de sus armas en nombre de la defensa de los otros paises. hablan de terrorismo y lo que ustedes realizan al rededor del mundo o sea las invasiones y matanza de civiles, es al final peor de lo que se podria mencionar sobre "terrorismo". Sufrimos grandes guerras, en donde tuvimos la VALENTIA de enfrentarnos a aliados mas armados que nosotros y salimos triunfantes en mucas batallas, la de Curupayty es una de ellas. La sangre PARAGUAYA es mucho mas pura que la de estos europeos que sin armas no harian nada. Los jovenes paraguayos valientes de hoy estan luchando para cambiar la historia de este pais, en donde, desafortunadamente no tuvimos ni arte ni parte en el pasado del mismo. Y lo cambiaremos, ya empezamos la accion renovadora, den tiempo a ello. Una Republica no se construye de la noche al dia.

Este es un hermoso pais, lleno de cultura, musica, amabilidad, y grandes valores que ya no existen en el mundo. A los gringos e ingleses aprendan a tener bolas como nosotros los PARAGUAYOS, la RAZA GUARANI, y veran que con BOlas si se llega lejos.

Admin
11 September 2007 at 15:42

From letters to the editor:

Sent by Maria Cristina Acosta Alvarez, Charge'd Affaires, Embajada de la Republica del Paraguay, Londres- Gran Bretana (Paraguay embassy , UK)

I am writing to you in reference to the article “Land Of the Old General” published by “New Statesman” on August 16th 2007. As the head representative of the Government of Paraguay in London, I fully disagree with the content of the above mentioned article whose inaccuracies need to be appropriately addressed in order to picture a much more realistic overview of the country.

Firstly, it is of utmost importance to point out that a full democracy was restored in Paraguay in February 1989 and it is fully maintained to date. Accordingly, an entire generation has been formed in our country since former President Stroessner left power 18 years ago. Therefore making references to a completely overcome scenario in Paraguay is not only in appropriate but outdated, bearing in mind that nearly 65% of the Paraguayan population is under 30 years old. Furthermore, it is also unjustified to ignore the significant improvements dynamically achieved by the country in recent years in the field of human rights, as well as social and economical developments for the welfare of the Paraguayan people.

Some governmental achievements are especially remarkable, mainly since 2003 under the current administration such as the public policies which led to a significant boost in social expenditures especially with regard to higher access to education, concerning both primary and secondary schools which was increased to no less than 15% in the last five years. Accordingly, full commitment to the accomplishment of UN Millenium Goals has been stressed repeatedly by the Paraguayan Government in all fields concerned, mainly education, poverty alleviation and sustainable development for the whole population not to mention others.

As all other countries in South America, Paraguay has a number of political issues as well as economic problems and poverty, although by no means could be compared to other national cases in the same region. No other country has had the tragic experience of rebuilding a whole population and infrastructure after the two more destructive wars in the continent in the last 140 years which decimated its population by no less than 70%. It is also surprising that the article mixes opinion and a few historic and social facts, for example the assertion that “Paraguay population is largely indigenous and poor” is undoubtedly mistaken, taken into account that more than 90% of the whole population is a rich mixture of Europeans and native inhabitants called “mestizos” which by the way are considered by most foreign visitors as “some of the most hospitable, kindest and generous people in the world”.

It is also not understandable how the author could not mention that Paraguay is the only country in the whole continent which still maintains widely its native language called “Guarani”, which is not only a national language but official one, and it is spoken by nearly 85% of the population and consequently the country is the only “bilingual”state in South America.

All these facts contradict the misleading information provided in the mentioned article, which originated this letter. On another note, it is very unfortunate that the author did not have the opportunity nor the willingness to visit the natural wonders of Paraguay, which are well known worldwide, such as the Jesuit Missions, among them the Ruins of Santisima Trinidad and Jesus which were declared "World Heritage Site" by UNESCO. We should also mention the huge hydroelectric power plant dam of Itaipu, shared with Brazil considered the biggest of the world, and the remarkable tourist complex around this area, the numerous museums and outstanding colonial churches with the "Guarani Baroque" style, amongst many attractions of rural adventure and sports tourism as well as natural forest reserves developed in recent years among other wonders of Paraguay.

Should Mr. Davies decide to give our country another chance, he should make sure to have enough and accurate information, not to mention another perspective and willingness to describe all sides of the story just to conduct an appropriate research more realistically.

Consequently, I would highly appreciate it if you could publish this letter in its entirety, not only for the benefit of accurate information provided to your readers, but also as a gesture of respect towards a country which deserves, as any other in the world, due consideration and regard for its dignity, in the same way that the Paraguayan people respect all other countries and nations.

Yours Sincerely,

Maria Cristina Acosta Alvarez

Charge'd Affaires

Meri
14 September 2007 at 23:40

Now I no longer know who to believe, Maria Cristina or Ben Davies. But at least there are two perspectives at hand! Thanks lots to both.

Pab
15 September 2007 at 01:21

"The most common perception of Paraguay among Argentinians and Brazilians today seems to be that it is a den of car thieves, gun runners, money launderers and drug smugglers, ruled by a bunch of car thieves, gun runners, money launderers and drug smugglers. Although grossly unfair, there are good reasons why this stereotype has developed. " -Patrick McCully

Such stereotype is unfair indeed, but there is much truth in it. Particularly in the rulers' bit. And as we all know, those rulong a country are significantly less than the rest of the population.

Mr Davies' tabloid-style article attests only that the most hospitable people on Earth, with admission standards allegedly as low as comprehending fleeing Nazis, for some reason did not care to accomodate him in proper fashion.

masofia
20 September 2007 at 12:37

This article is just wrote but some ignorant that I can not believe he is a journalist! Davies you are not smart, you have no idea what are you writing about. It's hard to believe either that he goes to the most friendly place of the world and he is unable to make any good social contact, something is very wrong with you. You should take most of the 2000 off like you did in the 1990's.

Mike
20 September 2007 at 13:32

As someone who has visited over 30 countries on all 6 inhabited continents, it's hard to understand how Mr. Davies could have such an opinion. Paraguay was the only country I cared to return to a third time. Its greatest resources, no longer the coastal beaches or Iguassu Falls, are by far its people.

As with any big city, there are dangerous places to avoid at night, but to describe it as a place that the people don't care about is unfair.

Davies reaches desperately for historical comparison to Graham Greene's experiences citing tabloid papers as evidence. Wow. Despite the fact that this journalist writes as if he's trying to impress his High School English teacher for his "how I spent my summer vacation" homework, many people take his article seriously.

Spending 10 days in such a place, and unable to socially engage anyone besides other exiles? As Pab states so poignantly, "the most hospitable people on Earth...for some reason did not care to accommodate him in proper fashion." You've embarrassed yourself enough, do yourself a favor and spend your next summer vacation in Venice. I'm sorry you found Paraguay so appalling, but those of us that see its beauty are simply sorry you found it.

Mike

Maryland, USA

Ben Davies
20 September 2007 at 15:01

And I'm sorry Mike that you visited Paraguay three times and didn't realise it was land-locked.

LGD
21 September 2007 at 00:29

I think Mike meant that as coastal beaches and Iguaçu falls are not longer Paraguay's (presumably territory lost in one of its wars?), Paraguay's greatest riches now lay in its people.

Mr. Davies, perhaps if you stop patronising people (or places) quite so easily you might actually get to see beyond the surface of things and might even get to understand something!

corporatedenizen
21 September 2007 at 14:44

Mr. Ben D.,

After reading your close minded experience of Paraguay it has become very clear that it is you that is land-locked. Many of the comments you have made are indicative of someone who is incapable of stepping outside of their pampered bubble and take in different cultures and surroundings. Haven't you ever heard of not judging a book by its cover? Evidently you're a person that forms opinions based solely off the surface and requires room service and a Starbucks on every street corner.

What country doesn't have corruption? The US Justice Department is currently investigating one of the top Democratic fundraisers to the Clintons. The only difference between the corruption in other countries and the US is that we have lobbyists to make everything appear legal.

What a shame that you were lucky enough to visit Paraguay and that you didn't take the time to assimilate and interact with some of the kindest people that I've had the chance to. I've traveled and spent time in many countries that you couldn't afford to go and been to countries that you couldn't pay me enough to revisit and there's always been something positive that I've taken with me and have been able to share with others.

I like to believe all people are inherently good natured and when I begin to doubt this...I think about the two wonderful visits I had to Paraguay to remind myself for the most part...they are.

You my friend need to remain in your 4 star hotel watching reruns of the Simple Life.

-GOP '08

Diego Garcia
21 September 2007 at 16:13

Knowledge not supposition helps I find... The Chaco War (1932-1935) was the result of a territory dispute between Bolivia and Paraguay. Both landlocked countries sought an expansion of territory in an effort to gain better access to the River Paraguay.

doggie
21 September 2007 at 17:04

People might criticize this article but I challenge them to name some additional tourist atractions that a tourist might actually want to go to. Paraguay might have its charms, but no one would confuse it with a tourist destination. I love my matecito a much as the next guy, but still think Ben Davies was not far off the mark.

fiscal
22 September 2007 at 16:27

I think Ben David is right in what he wrote about Paraguay. No ofense paraguayan people.....but that is all true. Maria Cristina Acosta, did not give an example of democracy, I can give it: Nicanor Duarte Frutos, current president of Paraguay is trying to change the constitution since three years ago, to remain in the big chair, is that what you call democracy?... I don't think so. Another example about Tourism: The Jesuits ruins; there are more in Argentina, well organized, clean and espectacular but, very few and abandoned ruins in the Paraguayan side. Foz do Iguazu is not even in Paraguayan side.

It was written also that Paraguay is the only country in the whole continent which still maintains widely its native language called “Guarani"; most of the people that I meet in Paraguay didn't speak "Guarani". Maybe Maria Cristina haven't visited countries like Mexico, to realize how many native languages and dialects they speak: Mixteco, Zapoteco, Nahuatl, etc.

I agree that you can fidn very nice and friendly people in Paraguay, but you can also find very nice people in every single country of this wonderful world.

Paraguayans, you should help your country with actions, your reputation is in your hands.

el_gallego
30 September 2007 at 16:48

Why the fluck do people still talk write sentences like

"As I sat in a crumbling, empty hotel in Asunción, it was hard to imagine a good reason for coming to Paraguay unless one was a fleeing Nazi or fancied a career in smuggling."

Newsflash ameteur(ish) journalists - Nazi war ciminals stopped fleeing abroad well over 50 years ago, and Graham Greene has been dead longer than many of you have been familiar with his novels.

When you write about Italy, do you harken back to Musolini? Give the Lonely Planet cliches a rest and stop boring us with this trite "journalism".

el_gallego
30 September 2007 at 16:59

Oh, and Graham Greene, granted he was a great author but his morals were more than a bit compromised, funny he would go on about you might want to read more about him rather than just cribbing his work for your article.

I assume you paid royalties to his estate? You ought to be ashamed to have gotten little more out of a trip to Paraguay than that there is corruption and that your heavily weighted expectations have been fulfilled. Paraguay is not perfect, but it is an interesting mix of cultures - you mentioned nothing about the strong (though small) Asian communities there, the popularity of an indigenous language over Spanish in many areas, the large Arab population, etc.

What lazy, poor developed and researched garbage. How did you slip this one past your Editor? Do you know anything about the US complicitness with Gen Stroessner?

el_gallego
30 September 2007 at 17:24

Steamed: Ben Davis only turns up to make some shite reply about the country being landlocked, not even beginning to address the valid points of numerous other posters.

If you are going to pretend to be a journalist, why not take some responsibility for what you to write and reply that points the previous people mention?

Susy Dack
17 February 2008 at 00:16

Dear Mr Davis

What is wrong with YOU??... are your trying to gain popularity by writing negative sides of a country?

Have you travelled extensively and study many other cultures and analised your own country before you write. Are you so angry about life? that you have chosen to target Paraguay now?...

Typical men... who feels recentful ... about something he has suffered... Sigmud Freud..

Did your mum did not provide milk with love to you as a baby?... as psychology describes men who writes in this way targeting a place thinking that those awful things he writes does not happens in any other part of the world..

Tell me when is your birthday day so that I can send you a book (psychoterapy) by the way.. that helps recentful men to deal with their own angriness and unhappiness. I also recommend you a good business evening course to find a way to get marketing, and sell youself..

Come on! Mr Davis.. travel a little bit more...round the globe or have a nice internal tour inside your own country and you will probably will learn that there are many many many social problems that will be topic for your next recentful letter.

All the best :

SUSY DACK .

Phsychology consultant.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ben Davies trained as a journalist after taking most of the 1990s off. Prior to joining the New Statesman he spent five years working as a politics reporter for the BBC News website. He lives in North London.

Read More

Vote!

Is capitalism finished?