Registered user login:

Duncan slams Lib Dems in gay rights row

Matthew Holehouse

Published 30 July 2007

Alan Duncan says the Lib Dems should "eat their words" after criticising the Tories' voting record on gay rights legislation.

Alan Duncan, the first openly gay Conservative MP, has branded the Liberal Democrats "shits" after the party launched an attack on the Conservatives' failure to support gay rights.

Lib Dems equality spokesperson Jo Swinson last week released a compilation of members of the shadow Cabinet's voting history since 1998.

The figures, disputed by the Tories, suggest that 80 percent of the 25-member team has voted against major items of gay rights legislation in that period. Ninety percent of those eligible voted against the equalisation of the age of consent and 85 percent voted against the repeal of Section 28.

Among Tory MPs, 85 percent failed to vote for regulations passed this year outlawing the denial of goods and services based on sexuality and 54 percent polled this year opposed equal rights for homosexual couples.

"Despite David Cameron's façade of "liberal" conservatism, his voting record, the voting record of the Shadow Cabinet that he appointed, and the views held amongst his party paint a very different picture," it says.

But Duncan, shadow secretary for business, enterprise and regulatory reform, told newstatesman.com that the Liberal Democrats’ criticism was out-dated and claimed the Tories were in step with a wider consensus on gay rights issues.

He also said it was unwise for the Lib Dems, whose president, Simon Hughes, ran successfully for parliament in the 1983 Bermondsey by-election against Peter Tatchell as "the straight choice", to criticise the Tories over gay rights.

"There was never such a disgusting and contemptible election campaign as that waged by Simon Hughes against Peter Tatchell, so it's very unwise for the Lib Dems to rake this sort of thing up. They were the last party in Parliament to have an openly gay member within their ranks. They should scurry away and eat their words.

"As Matthew Parris argues, at last, the agenda is largely complete. Homosexuality should be out of politics and just included in daily life. If they want to re-politicise a settled consensus, I have complete contempt for them."

"Historically, the Conservatives have been behind the curve, whilst Tony Blair was very good on the equality agenda. But a piece of research like this isn't constructive. It just makes the Liberal Democrats look like shits. You can quote me on that."

Despite his recent support for the Sexual Orientation Discrimination legislation and civil partnerships, Tory leader Cameron has a chequered record on gay rights, having voted against gay adoption under a three-line whip.

But a Tory spokesman said Cameron had abstained from a whipped vote under former leader Iain Duncan Smith on the repeal of Section 28 and supported gay adoption. In fact, Cameron voted against the repeal of Section 28 passing to a second reading before abstaining on the second reading.

In 2000 as candidate for Witney he told a local paper that the Blair government “continues to be obsessed with their 'fringe' agenda, including deeply unpopular moves like repealing Section 28 and allowing the promotion of homosexuality in schools,” and that “Blair has moved heaven and earth to allow the promotion of homosexuality in schools”.

But a spokesman tried to brush off the comments. "It was only as a candidate. If you know how politics works you'll see why being a candidate is different to being an MP," he said.

“The Conservative Party has campaigned for equal treatment for the gay community and on the 40th anniversary of the decriminalisation of homosexuality we should be celebrating what has been achieved since, not playing petty politics with this issue.”

But Swinson claimed the appointment of shadow cabinet members such as Eric Pickles, the new shadow secretary of state for communities and local government who had previously failed to back a single piece of gay rights legislation, called Cameron’s judgment into question.

"Pickle's appointment is deeply concerning,” said Swinson. “It's a question of looking at voting records. We have had a lot rhetoric about change. I think it's important at this stage to look at their extremely poor record."

Hazel Blears, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, said the Conservative Party was “riddled with old ideas”: “In 18 years in office the Conservatives did next to nothing to advance the cause of gay rights in Britain."

Veteran gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said: "It's good that David Cameron in recent years has had a Damascene conversion to gay equality. I hope he's sincere.

“But quite clearly most members of his shadow cabinet and most backbench MPs continue to support anti-gay discrimination. The lesbian and gay community would have good reason to fear the return to power of a Conservative government. Most of their MPs want to keep lesbians and gays as second class citizens."

Tatchell also criticised last month's Tory appointment of 'modernising' Muslim lawyer Sayeeda Warsi to the position of Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion.

In literature distributed during her 2005 council election campaign she accused Labour of “allowing school children to be propositioned for homosexual relationships”, and denounced the “promotion of homosexuality that undermines family life”.

Tatchell said Warsi was unfit to serve in the shadow cabinet: “She fought an immensely homophobic campaign in the last general election in which she made false claims about government gay rights policy. It beggars belief that David Cameron has appointed such a bigoted woman. Her views on gay rights echo the homophobia of Nick Griffin of the BNP."

Post this article to

7 comments from readers

Tim13
30 July 2007 at 14:49

It is disturbing - and possibly a comment on the way the Tories still think - that 'a spokesman" claimed that things are done differently by candidates and MPs. This appears to mean, in the context, that you are expected to lie as a candidate, presumably in order to gain votes. Another attitude the electorate would find totally sickening. As a former candidate myself, I could not condone this cynical approach.

dave
30 July 2007 at 15:53

Alan Duncan is deluded if he thinks his party in now warm and cuddly after others fought for gay rights all these years.

If his party is so supportive of gay peoplewhy do they just get carried along by the left. Why dont that show some initiative and do something NICE on their own!

Berate GW bush for his homphobia or speak up for gay rights in Jamaica or Poland.

I dont think so!

Zeke
30 July 2007 at 19:40

Sad to say that England has its own version of delusional Log Cabin Republicans.

markpack
31 July 2007 at 09:49

Alan Duncan's got wrong what Simon Hughes's leaflets really said in the Bermondsey by-election. They didn't describe Simon Hughes as the "straight choice" but rather said the contest itself was a "straight choice" between Liberal and Labour. That's a perfectly normal phrase which is widely used by politicians of all parties to describe two-horse race elections. I've seen it used many, many times by Conservatives too.

JoSwinson
31 July 2007 at 18:07

Actions speak louder than words!

Mr. Duncan claims the Tories are part of a wider consensus on gay rights issues; however this proposition would seem overwhelmingly refuted by evidence. In March this year, Tory MPs voted 3 to 1 against measures to protect lesbian, gay and bisexual people from discrimination in goods and services. Furthermore in June a Populus survey showed 54 percent of Tory MPs opposed equal rights for homosexual couples.

Whatever accusations Mr. Duncan may chose to throw at me for saying this, the voting record of the Conservative party, including the voting record of the party this year, would send a chill down the spine of most, if not all, lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender members of society. It is not unreasonable to point this out.

Amber
12 September 2007 at 00:57

i think gays in society are treated very unequeally and if christians catholics and anglicans are such accepting people why can they accept gays as they have done nothing wrong! After all it would be a sin to reject people just because of their sexuality think about that!

Nick
03 May 2008 at 12:54

The ancients - including the writers of the Bible - thought that men carried the seed of the next generation, so misusing it in any way by not placing it in a woman's uterus was almost tantamount to infanticide. What women did was therefore not so important. Why can't homophobic religions accept the realisation brought about by the development of the microscope: that it is women who carry the seed, not men? Because acceptance would challenge their chosen belief that God wrote the Bible and other religious texts.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Can Gordon Brown recover from the 10p tax fiasco?

Designed by Wilson Fletcher