Registered user login:

More of the same is not an option

John McDonnell

Published 15 May 2007

John McDonnell says New Labour has left large parts of the electorate alienated or disappointed - that's why he wants to challenge Gordon Brown for the leadership

When Labour was elected in 1997, it was on a wave of euphoria – a landslide victory built on a broad coalition of progressive support. Since that time we have systematically alienated or disappointed large sections of that coalition.

Now is the time to stand back and look objectively at where we are and why we have lost section after section of the coalition that brought us to power.

Undoubtedly, the biggest factor has been Iraq. We came to power promising an “ethical foreign policy”, yet we have sold arms to repressive regimes, started several wars, and have tied ourselves to the most right wing US Administration in living memory. We are now on the brink of renewing Trident, for which we are dependent on the US, and of siting Bush’s missile defence system on British soil. People did not vote Labour to implement the foreign policy of the Republican neocons. The US Democrats have come forward with a plan to withdraw troops from Iraq, we should be building a special relationship with them to implement this plan.

In the health service, we told people there was “24 hours to save the NHS” and true to our manifesto set about dismantling the disastrous internal market. After 20 years of underinvestment, the new money going into the NHS was a breath of fresh air, but we soon started to ignore our own advice and set about rebuilding the NHS internal market, and expanding the PFI schemes that the Tories began.

The results are seen clearly today, NHS budgets eaten up by exorbitant payments to PFI companies, lawyers’ fees, and contract managers. Services are cut, specialist units closed and staff morale damaged by the pay cuts announced this year – while patients still don’t feel they have much input into the service.

In our 1997 manifesto, we promised “all pensioners should share fairly in the increasing prosperity of the nation”, yet 2 million remain in poverty, and over 20,000 died from cold last year. The basic state pension is now worth less than one-seventh of average male earnings (it was worth one-quarter in 1979), and the Pension Credit is not claimed by nearly 40% of pensioners entitled.

We must immediately restore the earnings link that was broken by the Tories and increase the basic state pension to the Pension Credit level of £119 per week. It is a national disgrace that we have the worst state pension in Europe, and spend just half of the European average on our pensions system.

Of course, the main slogan of our 1997 campaign was ‘Education, education, education’ and there is no doubt that investment has gone in and standards have improved – yet, as in the health service, this New Labour obsession with privatisation and internal markets has wasted vast resources. Trust Schools and Academies reduce community involvement. PFI schemes mean that the school buildings are owned by private companies who charge extortionate fees which exclude local people from using the school as a community resource. A generation of students have come to know the Labour Party for top-up fees, which we expressly ruled out in our 2001 manifesto.

I am standing because we need to change our policies to reconnect with the needs of the British people, and so that we can rebuild the progressive coalition to defeat the Tories at the next election. My key pledges are:

Reducing inequality and poverty

  • A green energy policy based on renewable power sources

  • An end to privatisation in our public services

  • A peaceful and independent foreign policy

  • The restoration of civil liberties and trade union rights as part of a new constitutional settlement
  • John’s new book, Another World is Possible, a manifesto for 21st Century socialism, is available by going to his campaign website

    Post this article to

    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • newsvine
    • NowPublic
    • Reddit

    4 comments from readers

    IrritatedofTonbridge
    15 May 2007 at 14:48

    I want to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony but, a bit like John McDonnell, I haven't costed my plan so no-one takes it seriously!

    Jgeorge
    15 May 2007 at 17:27

    Go on McDonnell - give GB a good run for his money. It's about time you grumpy back benchers stopped winge-ing from the sidelines and took on the arrogant new labour leaders!

    seniorsnetwork
    16 May 2007 at 09:35

    John - Please give Gordon a run for his money - he was the worst chancellor for pensioners - he was the architect of the fiscal promises made in 1997 - promises that were NEVER upheld. He promised to end means testing for pensioners, he promised to take us out of poverty. He has systematically destroyed the NHS by depriving it of funding and increasing PFI funding.

    New Labour in Scotland lost to the SNP because of Tony & Gordon - they NEVER listened to the electorate. It should be a "wake up" call for New Labour and Gordon - carry out your 1997 election promises befor you make any more promises.

    John Lynch@seniorsnetwork.co.uk

    tinalouise
    16 May 2007 at 14:23

    Although not a supporter of this govenment or the party - I will be relieved if someone can oppose Gordon Brown, particularly on the issue of the Iraq war. When this government was elected, it was elected with Blair at its head and surely any change to the government is a matter for the people as well as the party? I feel it underhanded to 'switch' leaders - this being the key 'decider' role.

    We are told it is the party we are voting for - but in real world reality (and in the world of image makers/make-up artists/spin doctors etc.) the leader of that party is a large part of the reason for the vote and his departure is our issue.

    I don't know if you (JM) will be better...but I do know I want a choice and I want a say. I have little faith in politicians or our system of government, so forgive my lack of enthusiasm for your hopeful words - it is just that it would be unheard of for you to carry them out once in office.

    So much of this is like a power game - and so little about the people whose money you are supposed to wisely handle in order to create good government to facilitate better ways of living.

    *sigh

    Namaste,

    Tina Louise

    www.armsagainstwar.info

    Post your comment

    Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

    We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

    Read More

    Vote!

    Are women equal now?

    Win Manu Chao
    Albums!

    Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

    Enter online