Registered user login:

Campus Radicals

Campus Radicals Homepage

How to tackle gun culture

  • Posted by Chinwe Akomah
  • 23 March 2007

Politics and sociology undergraduate Chinwe Akomah gives her take on Britain's gun 'culture'

In the aftermath of the four London murders in February Tony Blair, criticised for responding to the growing level of gun crime with "knee- jerk" reactions, has upped his game in a bid to try to tackle the escalating firearms culture in Britain.

The Prime Minister is proposing an extension of mandatory sentencing of 17 year olds from the already implemented three years to five years - the current ruling on 18+ teenagers toting guns.

Blair is also considering introducing surveillance methods to track down individuals suspected of carrying weaponry, another dogged step toward creating Labour’s model “surveillance society”.

There is definitely something to be said of Blair’s iron grip legislation. Indeed, implementing such policies will reduce the number of reported crimes in the short term yet gun crime itself will continue to fly under the policy radar. It has already risen by 0.6:% in the past year.

Some of members of the black community have also voiced their concerns over whether the law will drive gun crime off the streets or merely into the hands of even younger individuals. Drug dealers, using firearms to protect their trade, will target legally-protected youngsters to run their violent errands. How does Blair propose to tackle this? How far will the legislative bar be lowered? Will we soon be handcuffing infants?

Moreover, it is important not to forget that someone as young as 16 can purchase a knife. In 2006, knife crime rose to 42,020 incidents almost 72% more than gun crime but in the furore surrounding the London murders, tackling rapidly rising knife crime has been blindsided.

Blair has lucidly stated that gun crime is not a "general state of Britishness" and "British young people" but concerns a specific culture and specific group of people. The commonplace notion is that the problem is primarily within the black community but with such undertones highlighting government’s course of action how is the trust of the black community to be enlisted when the Downing street introduces its new spy kit.

It is too early to have the phrase "institutionalised racism" bandied around but one cannot escape the possible detrimental effects this could have on community-police liaisons.

Lords and MP alike have grappled with why youngsters engage in gun crime, citing phrases such as the “glorification of guns and knives” and “the alienation of young people” but as is the case with judges who sit on their aristocratic pedestals and dictate how the law should be obeyed, the very people who recycle these overused statements are those who are considerably distanced from young black teens.

Occasionally The Times will draw on the words of a youth worker from south London for solid social backing but talking about teens as opposed to talking to them is to alienate them even further.

The truth is, one can only be so sure as to whether it is the broken family or the lack of male models in society that accounts for high levels of crime but by talking, communicating and trying to understand the young people themselves.

If we continue to treat the youth as individuals at the margins of society; statistics to be analysed or as scapegoats to be criminalised then 'gun culture' will only escalate.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

simonawade
27 June 2007 at 12:54

I feel that when young people turn on the TV and see British and American soldiers arguably older and more organised gangs invading foreign territories and killing civilians and other "gang " members with weapons made in this country and the kudos that is attached to this, that maybe. Just maybe it shapes the minds of our young people. The irony of Toni Anne Byfields murder in Brent was its proximity to an arms manufacturer a mere 50 meters away .Coincidence or globalisation of the arms industry and those who promote it?

Bachelor_of_Law
02 October 2007 at 12:37

"Institutionalised racism" or the ever strengthening of the Nanny State?

It is a fact that a significant majority of London's gun crime originates from the black youth. That is not a racist comment it is merely an expression of fact.

If Police initiatives like trident can be said to be institutionally racist then it just shows how the race card is being over used on issues of objective intelligence based crime prevention.

If anything the state is attempting to protect the black youth by implementing initiatives to tackle the problem so it can be said that black youths are receiving better protection than any other ethnicity in London as they are being afforded special units to tackle a problem which is black youth specific.

Arguably this strategy makes sense as the problem is originating from a specific section of society hence a concentrated task force is an appropriate reply to prevent a flanking manoeuvre from crime and disorder.

The introduction of more CCTV into London will not prevent the problem it will merely increase the strength of the big brother state and the citizens of Britain need to review such initiatives and if necessary (and I would submit that it is) a petition should be organised to prevent it.

I strongly disagree with the notion that judges 'sit on their aristocratic pedestals and dictate how the law should be obeyed' as that phrase in itself suggests a feeling of animosity.

Just like in any profession people are individuals and have their own slant on life some are stricter then others. Judges are impartial barring the odd exception however there are procedures in place to rectify such rulings. No system can be perfect.

In respects to the 'aristocrat' comment it is a well known fact that the aristocracy has been abolished a long time ago and the fact that someone has not lived in a 'ghetto' in their life and has not experienced 'the struggles' does not mean they cannot conduct an impartial tribunal.

Empathy only goes to mitigating a sentence if a person has been found guilty of a crime and it is the job of the barrister to convey the message to the tribunal.

Deciding whether a person is in fact guilty goes to the tribunal of fact which is the jury and NOT the judge. The jury are drawn from all walks of life.

It is submitted that parents should take responsibility for their children and perhaps relocate to another area if the problem is area specific and the argument of not being able to relocate due to financial restraints is not valid as it is a fact that London councils are attempting to persuade council tenants to move to the country: for instance Wales via the council housing scheme.

I resent the fact that many Britons rely on the state to rectify all their problems. The citizens of this country are too used to the nanny state and blame everything on it if parliament cannot come up with a solution.

Take some initiative and responsibility for your own children and that goes not only to the black community but also to all other ethnicities as we are all well aware of the ever growing problems of anti-social behaviour all over the country and asbos are not the solution.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Chinwe Akomah is in her final year of studying for a BA in Politics and Sociology at Warwick University. When she graduates she plans to study to become a newspaper journalist.

Recent Posts

Arms fair?

  • By Robbie Gillett
  • 13 September 2007

Universities and the arms trade

  • By Tim Street
  • 04 July 2007

Victory in Gower Street

  • By Sara Hall
  • 15 June 2007

Global university without a global conscience

  • By Sara Hall
  • 11 June 2007

Do you really consider yourself human?

  • By Tim Collins
  • 05 June 2007

Stick to what you know best

  • By Ben Ullmann
  • 24 May 2007

Hizb-ut Tahrir

  • By Tim Collins
  • 17 April 2007