Registered user login:

Bright'sBlog

Bright's Blog

Politics uncovered by Martin Bright, New Statesman political editor

Bright's Blog Homepage

We're independent, are you?

  • Posted by Martin Bright
  • 16 February 2007

Bright responds to Guido Fawkes

The right-wing blogger Paul Staines has today alleged on his "Guido Fawkes" website that the independence of the New Statesman is under question. Once again he has not allowed accuracy to get in the way of a piece of mischief.

He suggests the editorial decision not to write about the charity commission investigation into the Smith Institute think tank, which is housed next door to the magazine, is in some way politically motivated. More generally, he suggests the magazine is uncritical of Gordon Brown Both claims are nonsense.
We have not written about the Smith Institute because we didn't think anybody outside the blogosphere would be interested. It's as simple as that.

As for the idea that we are soft on Brown, perhaps he might care to look at any of the many political columns, features and editorials of the past year or more in the magazine that are strongly critical of him. I commend readers to my column this week, which is critical of Brown's circle and by implication the Chancellor himself. If anything, some politicians and journalists charge us with over-compensating for the supposed relationship between Brown and the NS by being over-critical.

As for the present interest in the Smith Institute, it is right and proper that the charity commission should investigate its charitable status and I hope it will do the same with other thinktanks on the left and right. Perhaps it should initiate an inquiry into the charitable status of think tanks as a whole or perhaps that would be better done by a parliamentary committee. It is clearly something that should be kept under constant scrutiny by MPs, the charity commission and journalists.

The Smith Institute is not the New Statesman, and so I won't presume to speak for it. No-one from the Smith Institute has ever tried to influence what I write or even persuade me of the wisdom of the Brownite worldview. It is perfectly legitimate for right-wing newspapers and bloggers to use it as a stick with which to beat Brown, but it is neither fair nor accurate to suggest that the independence of the NS is compromised in any way as a result.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

guido
16 February 2007 at 17:16

"We have not written about the Smith Institute because we didn't think anybody outside the blogosphere would be interested. It's as simple as that."

Cause for thought

Guardian Unlimited, UK - 15 Feb 2007

Thinktanks are good news for British democracy - and the campaign against the Smith Institute should be viewed in this context. ...

Political blogger warned he could be jailed

Telegraph.co.uk, UK - 15 Feb 2007

By Christopher Hope, Whitehall Editor. The Charity Commission has warned an online blogger he could go to jail unless he submits information he has gathered ...

Inquiry opens wider questions on political bias

Financial Times, UK - 14 Feb 2007

By Jean Eaglesham, Chief Political Correspondent. The repercussions of the Charity Commission's continuing inquiry into the Smith Institute could stretch ...

Smith Institute in trouble again

Guardian Unlimited, UK - 12 Feb 2007

The Smith Institute, already facing an investigation by the Charity Commission for overt party political bias, sent out invitations to prominent ...

Watchdog examines Brown's links to Smith Institute

Financial Times, UK - 1 Feb 2007

Concerns about the Smith Institute's relations with the chancellor were fuelled when it emerged it had been paid for work by a Treasury-commissioned review. ...

CC in political bias row over Downing St links

Legal Week, UK - 8 Feb 2007

The firm has been singled out on a political website for its involvement with The Smith Institute, which is currently under investigation by the Charity ...

Research Group Probed for Labour Ties Held Anti-Cameron Event

Bloomberg - 29 Jan 2007

The Smith Institute is registered as a charity under UK law, meaning it is exempt from tax and in return must remain politically neutral. ...

'Link' between Brown, donors and think tank

The Sunday Times, UK - 3 Feb 2007

... the biotech tycoon, and Lord Sainsbury, the former science minister, all attended Smith Institute functions where they were lauded by the chancellor. ...

Charity to be investigated over 'Gordon Brown links'

Independent, UK - 1 Feb 2007

The Smith Institute, set up to commemorate the former Labour leader John Smith, who died in 1994, has held events at 11 Downing Street and briefly employed ...

Tim_Ireland
16 February 2007 at 21:14

'Guido'... do let me know the moment you're prepared to openly discuss interest, lack of interest, and a lack of interest in declaring interests. I'm right here, waiting. In fact, I've been waiting here for over a month now.

Over to you.

Cheers

Tim Ireland

Deep irony
17 February 2007 at 00:16

Guido seemed this week to be particularly anxious to suppress an old guradian article so much so that he threatend a number of bloggers with legal action (after all he is a libertarian). Its currently hosted on a raft of foreign blogs,anyone can google Paul staines if they want to. The article itself is less interesting than his hypocrisy

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Martin Bright began his journalistic career writing in very simple English for a magazine aimed at French school children. This experience has informed his style ever since. He worked for the BBC World Service, and The Guardian before joining the Observer as Education Correspondent. He went on to become Home Affairs Editor before becoming the New Statesman's political editor in 2005.

Recent Posts

Five stark truths

  • By Martin Bright
  • 04 September 2008

And the winner is...

  • By Martin Bright
  • 29 August 2008

No glory for the other Team GB

  • By Martin Bright
  • 21 August 2008

Israel and The British Left: The Great Betrayal Revisited

  • By Martin Bright
  • 19 August 2008

The Death of Michael Baxandall

  • By Martin Bright
  • 19 August 2008

Walktalk Reaches London

  • By Martin Bright
  • 18 August 2008