Registered user login:

Bright'sBlog

Bright's Blog

Politics uncovered by Martin Bright, New Statesman political editor

Bright's Blog Homepage

The ire of Livingstone's spindoctor

  • Posted by Martin Bright
  • 30 January 2007

How Bright's blog has put Livingstone in a spin

A nasty little email from Ken Livingstone's main spinner Joy Johnson to my editor:

-----Original Message-----


From: Joy Johnson

Sent: 30 January 2007 14:03

To: john kampfner

Subject: FW: Martin Bright on Civilisations conference.

John

Is this really what your political editor thinks of the Mayor of London and his administration? This was a serious conference - I know blogs are not meant to be that serious but as trivial as this?

... and this is my response:

Joy

I've just been forwarded your note to John.

The conference was a disgrace. It was a set-up for panellists who didn't parrot the Ken line on radical Islam. It was genuinely discourteous to people who happened to dissent, who had given up their Saturdays to be shouted at and insulted for over an hour. The chairing of my session was miserable.
Unlike just about everything I have been asked to talk at for free including Islamic groups, I was not so much as thanked for my appearance let alone dropped a note (which is what reputable organisations such as the Fabians and the Social Market Foundation always do). The panel I was on (including the chair) were all opposed to my position, which does not make for an informed and balanced debate. The same was true of several other panels.

The conference was a vastly expensive exercise in right-wing Islamist propaganda. I think it was shameful that the people of London had to pay for this. It was a total sham.

In future why not email me direct or comment directly on my blog.

Martin

And this is her measured reaction:

From: Joy Johnson
Sent: 30 January 2007 15:15
To: Martin Bright
Subject: RE:


I will email who I like.


Then a few minutes later:

From: Joy Johnson
Sent: 30 January 2007 15:35
To: Martin Bright
Subject: RE:

You can take issue with the conference the personal abuse was unnecessary.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

Zkharya
30 January 2007 at 18:05

What personal abuse? And against whom?

It was Johnson who strongly implied, to a third person, Bright was 'trivial'.

'talk about projection.

Jonathan
30 January 2007 at 22:36

what Martin didn't mention - becasue unlike Ken's lackey he is too polite - was that it also cost him a day's childcare.

modernityblog
31 January 2007 at 00:43

Leaving aside the issue of Ken Livingstone's preposterous conferences for the moment, you and the New Statesman should be congratulated for making your blog so accessible with the Listen to function, it is a very nice touch and I do wish others would follow your example.

Back to politics, although I voted for Ken Livingston and even shook his hand once, I would not dream of ever voting for him again, whatever ticket he was on. The use and abuse of power is a very good indicator of people's true character and sadly to say Ken Livingstone's conduct since becoming Mayor has been appalling. He must assume that as long as he reorganised and improved London’s transport that Londoners would excuse any “eccentric” behaviour or his outbursts. Well this particular Londoner won't.

I would expect that Labour will do poorly if Ken Livingstone is their candidate for Mayor, he may well get in again on a reduced majority, but his antics have detracted from his potentially useful term in office.

geth
31 January 2007 at 22:11

what a way to try and repair your public image! perhaps the conferenc money might have been better spent on some decent PR training...

radius
04 February 2007 at 22:13

Interesting the "personal abuse" bit. I was banned from the Guardian's Comment is Free 3 months ago for a "personal attack" on Madeleine Bunting, namely referring to her as an 'apologist for clerical fascism'.

It seems suggesting that card-carrying liberals are supporting ultra-rightists now counts as personal abuse. Looks like we're all being shouted down.

Alcuin
05 February 2007 at 11:28

Hey, Radius. I only dip into the monkey house of CiF occasionally, but had you as one of the best informed and rational commenters, more than I can say of La Bunting.

Johnson's responses show the petulance of a five year old caught out with her hand in the cookie jar. I blame the parents.

geth
05 February 2007 at 21:09

radius, you got off lightly. i once got banned from the sophie elis-bextor website for talking about iraq too much. the american moderator had a very interesting take on the war on terror.

Patricia
08 February 2007 at 12:54

I attended the recent conference "Global Civilization or a Clash of Civilizations" with an open mind hoping to engage in an intelligent and BALANCED debate

about the rigours and vagaries of the "Multiculturalism" issue. The panels were comprised overwhelmingly of individuals who subscribe to Mayor Livingston's slanted worldview. Even the chairs (who, presumably ought to be neutral?) were clearly quite biased. Any panelist or delegate who tried to present a fair, moderate, or dissenting opinion was booed, hectored and shouted down. On the post-conference survey I let the Mayors Office know that I found the forum a farce, a disgrace and a ludicrous waste of resources! Please know, Martin, that many in the audience were grateful for your stellar contribution and for you bringing some dignity to the whole sorry proceedings...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Martin Bright began his journalistic career writing in very simple English for a magazine aimed at French school children. This experience has informed his style ever since. He worked for the BBC World Service, and The Guardian before joining the Observer as Education Correspondent. He went on to become Home Affairs Editor before becoming the New Statesman's political editor in 2005.

Recent Posts

Ingrid Betancourt -- who she?

  • By Martin Bright
  • 03 July 2008

Interview: Ed Balls

  • By Martin Bright and Suzanne Moore
  • 03 July 2008

When discrimination works

  • By Martin Bright
  • 03 July 2008

Duncan v Oborne?

  • By Martin Bright
  • 30 June 2008

Brown's Henley Nemesis and the Anti-Messiah Complex

  • By Martin Bright
  • 27 June 2008

Mr Brown's long year

  • By Martin Bright
  • 26 June 2008

Is it a Boycott or Not?

  • By Martin Bright
  • 24 June 2008