Registered user login:

ADifferentWayOfThinking

A Different Way Of Thinking

How society approaches disability from the perspective of someone with autism.

A Different Way Of Thinking Homepage

On the fringes?

  • Posted by James Medhurst
  • 14 December 2006

The mainstream media gives disabled people precious little coverage

Disability is regarded by many commentators as being a fringe concern and we receive precious little coverage in the mainstream media, in comparison with many other sections of society.

On the one hand, disabled people would not welcome the obsessive treatment that is given to Islam by the national press, but it would be nice for our existence to be at least acknowledged once in a while.

This neglect is compounded by the attitude of many employers and service providers, who resent making changes to their business practices for what they see as a tiny minority of the population.

In many cases, the only time that we are discussed is to ask the question, ‘Have disability rights gone too far?’ It is surely premature for the backlash to begin before widespread acceptance has yet been achieved.

It is a truism that there are far more disabled people than most people expect and there is an oft-quoted statistic that one in five of the UK population qualify for protection under the Disability Discrimination Act.

However, this figure is easily dismissed by assuming that most of these people have impairments which are regarded as relatively minor, such as back problems, dyslexia or depression.

Such a view is highly patronising and seriously underestimates the extent of exclusion faced by members of these groups. In any case, even if we grudgingly ignore them, the ‘disability problem’ stubbornly fails to disappear.

For example, 3% of British people have visual impairments that cannot be remedied with glasses, 2% use wheelchairs, and 1% will be diagnosed with schizophrenia in their lives.

We are not hiding. These numbers seem surprising because very few organisations have workforces even remotely reflecting these proportions, and most high street shops cannot be accessed by a lot of disabled people.

Even if there was a reason to visit the city centre, many people are completely unable to get there by public transport. Meanwhile, the total collapse of community cohesion combined with a general inability to cope with unusual behaviour causes many people with mental health difficulties to become socially isolated.

Although the encounters that we have on a day-to-day basis can sometimes be a reliable indicator of the composition of society, in this case they produce a dangerously distorted picture. I have given up any hope that TV with ever do enough to correct this perception.

When it is argued, to choose one example, that websites need not be made accessible to blind people, because not many of them use the internet, this is a clear case of putting the cart before the horse.

To quote a sentimental Kevin Costner film, ‘If you build it they will come.’ Being located in a deep pit, the Eden Project did not find it easy to provide access, but it has been rewarded with thousands of extra visitors, and the number of wheelchairs on show is a striking contrast to other tourist attractions. To someone who is not used to it, they seem to be everywhere.

It will only be possible to get a realistic perspective of the size of the disabled population when the same can be said of every single building in the country. Just one inaccessible shop does more to create segregation than a million veils.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers


15 December 2006 at 10:02

Well said about websites and tourist attractions. They need to be accessible to as many people as possible, even if that means more thought for minority groups. Even with it being a legal requirment for a lot of large websites, so many still ignore accessibility. At least this new one has great the stuff like the article reader.

David Heigham
15 December 2006 at 13:47

Something over 30 years ago, I calculated that the best we could realistically hope for on physical access for the disabled was to get it roughly right in 50 to 100 years. We seem to be about on track.

Internet access is a different sort of problem. It depends on technical progress, not just sustained spending on things we know how to do. The key innovation is probably a tactile "screen" that takes input and gives output. Once it exists, converting information into tactile form can get underway. How about a suitable Foundation offering a prize for inventing this?


17 December 2006 at 12:29

Some good points. I think though there is a case for a bit of "Walk Before You Run" as far as acsess is concerned. it is all well anfd good for places such as Tourist Attractions making the relevant changes so that they then ultimately make more money, because lets face it, it all comes down to that little point of Dosh at the end of the day, but how about, say the shops on the high street which so many are nowhere near complying with the access regulations. There was even a sign up on the door of one well known Bakery outlet that happens to be male name, which said, the staff are all trained and knowledgeable in the workings of the Disability Act and wil be only too pleased to help you with any matter or problem you have. Well for a start my wheelchair won't get up the steep step into the shop. so what do you want me to do sit outside and shout for attention and then shout in my order all the while sitting in the maybe pouring rain etc etc.. or go to the other totally independant Baker a few doors up the road who is completely accessible and actually makes you feel wanted when you go in too??? no brainer i think!! so day to day places need to get their act together first then on to the larger places etc.

Jonny

miscellaneous
03 January 2007 at 23:44

Mankind is diverse and ever resourceful so the barrier exists only in the minds of individuals. Everyone, including the “physically able” require some kind of assistance, often it will be physical help, and/or other types of help during some stage or situation in our lives. Therefore "no man is an island, entire of itself." (John Donne)

We are ALL of us less than perfect but I’m positive that one day architecture will be both aesthetic AND accessible to all.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

As a child, I was very successful in my schoolwork but found it difficult to make friends. I went to Cambridge University but dropped out after a year due to severe depression and spent most of the next year in a therapeutic community, before returning to Cambridge to complete my degree. I first identified myself as autistic in 1999 while I was studying psychology in London but I was not officially diagnosed until 2004 because of a year travelling in Australia and a great deal of NHS bureaucracy. I spent four years working for the BBC as a question writer for the Weakest Link but I am now studying law with the intention of training to be a solicitor. My hobbies include online poker and korfball, and I will be running the London Marathon in 2007. I now have many friends and I am rarely depressed but I remain single.

Recent Posts

Disabled on Big Brother

  • By James Medhurst
  • 05 August 2008

You don’t have to be mad to work here…

  • By James Medhurst
  • 20 May 2008

Nowhere to run

  • By James Medhurst
  • 17 March 2008

Incitement to Confusion

  • By James Medhurst
  • 23 January 2008

Making perfect babies

  • By James Medhurst
  • 07 December 2007

Scientific illiteracy

  • By James Medhurst
  • 31 October 2007

Looking for work is hard work

  • By James Medhurst
  • 24 September 2007