Registered user login:

Learn to be a bully

Anthony Lane

Published 30 October 2006

Observations on video game

Imagine your child at school. His classmates are terrifying other kids with baseball bats. Then they turn on the teachers, insult them and beat them up. Worse, imagine your child was directing the fighting, ordering random acts of violence.

It could be happening right now, thanks to the release of the video game Bully. In the United States, in the wake of the Amish school massacre, the game has unsurprisingly sparked street protests outside companies connected with making it.

One Florida lawyer, Jack Thompson, has attempted to have the game banned, arguing unsuccessfully that it violates the state's public-nuisance laws.

The most prominent critic of such video games has been Hillary Clinton, who last year attacked the game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas whose characters have sex. Clinton cited a study showing that these games, rated for those aged over 17, were being bought by boys as young as seven.

Now Bully has arrived in the UK. Keith Vaz, MP for Leicester East, has raised his concerns in Prime Minister's Questions that the game can be purchased by young children. More than a year ago, having seen an early version showing pupils beating each other, Vaz drew attention to the peril.

The response of the makers, Rockstar, who were also responsible for Grand Theft Auto, has been nonchalant. The "vilification of video games" was like the "backlash against music in the 50s when Elvis shook his hips", they say. But, as a sop to UK parents, they have dropped the Bully title. It is now called Canis Canem Edit (dog eat dog), maybe in the hope that the cerebral title will obscure the nature of the game. Anti-bullying campaigners invited for a preview have been told the game is a comedy.

The Rockstar website defends the game with another tactic. It emphasises that the central character does not act out of a desire to bully. Rather, he is picked on by students and teachers alike, promoting the idea that the player is a victim. Players of the game are urged to take on "the liars, cheats and snobs who are the most popular members of the student body and faculty". The promotion of a victim mentality which justifies acts of violence - "I am bullied, therefore I bully" - is a particularly insidious effect.

Analyses of school massacres show that perpetrators have often regarded themselves as victims taking revenge on their perceived tormentors.

The lawyer Jack Thompson, arguing his case for the banning of this game, called the game a "Columbine simulator" after the notorious high-school massacre when 12 teenagers and a teacher were killed by two students who were repeatedly bullied and became obsessed with shoot-'em-up video games.

Anti-bullying campaigners have made some progress, persuading Currys and PC World not to stock the game. However, the game's 15 rating, set by the British Board of Film Classification, remains and Bully is just about to become available at branches of HMV and Woolworths around the country.

Whether its release will be accompanied by an increase in violent bullying in our schools, only future statistics will reveal.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Dan Norton
23 March 2007 at 21:32

Amusing. I particularly like the fact that Mr Lane has rather curiously decided to omit the fact that the original judge of the court case in question stepped down from the case so that he could pursue Thompson's misconduct formally. Indeed if one were to do any research into Thompson at all it becomes obvious that the man is barely competent and will most likely be unable to practice law in Forida within the short future, due to his disputes with the Florida Bar.

Not to mention many of the irrelevant details, a prime example being: "Anti-bullying campaigners invited for a preview have been told the game is a comedy." So what? The genre of the game has nothing to do with how it's rated and in any case the game IS a black comedy.

Heck there are even some outright lies. "The most prominent critic of such video games has been Hillary Clinton, who last year attacked the game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas whose characters have sex." Nope, doesn’t happen. There’s a third party mod on the internet that re-adds some deleted content of that nature, but unless your children can both by the game in question (which unless the SHOPS are breaking the law shouldn’t be possible without adult consent) and possess the knowledge to track down and download third party content that Rockstar has no control over (and any parent who knows what they’re doing can purchase a number of programs to ensure they have control of what their children can access/download over the internet).

I’m not so much rankled that Lane doesn’t like the game (it’s not exactly highbrow material) but that he didn’t even attempt to do the least bit of research on the topic before whittling off an tabloidesque article and then managed to get it past the editors despite the argument having nothing substantial to back it beyond scaremongering vitriol. How sad.

Jimmy
12 March 2008 at 01:33

I think this article's spot on - read the bbc report from a few days ago: "The abuse includes dunking pupils' heads in toilets, photographing them naked and physically assaulting them." It's one of those games which deliberately stirs up controversy so that it sells. Probably best if the media didn't give it any attention.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7281206.stm

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Does Hillary Clinton deserve to be secretary of state?