Return to: Home | Culture | Food

William Skidelsky on the decline of Jamie Oliver

William Skidelsky

Published 13 September 2004

Not-for-profit restaurants do not have to be like Jamie Oliver's Fifteen

Jamie Oliver has been having a tough time of it lately. A leading restaurant guide recently awarded his London restaurant Fifteen (which gives unemployed teenagers the chance to train as professional chefs) the worst rating of all 32 establishments in its most expensive (£65-a-head) category. Customers complained of "average" food, "unbelievably rude" service and prices that "seriously take the piss". The charitable aspect of the venture has also come under scrutiny. Oliver's trainees have dropped out at a surprisingly high rate, and the scheme has had only a few unqualified success stories.

All this must have come as a bit of a shock to Oliver, who not so long ago seemed destined to succeed at everything he did. After he had charmed (and made) millions with his cheeky-chappie television persona, his new venture seemed poised to prove what a thoroughly nice chap he was. Fifteen undoubtedly sprang from laudable intentions - when it opened, Oliver spoke of his desire for others to have the same opportunities as he'd had.

But this may have been part of the problem. Oliver's route to wealth and fame was through television; as such, his conception of success was always likely to be bound up with that medium. Fifteen was never just a charitable venture; part of its raison d'etre was to provide the ammunition for a reality-TV show. In helping the young people to solve one set of problems, wasn't the project saddling them with another - that of coping with the pressures of being, at least in a small way, famous?

I have been to Fifteen just once, for a special dinner that the 15 original apprentices cooked in order to test how much progress they had made. The evening was filmed for the second of the two television series made about Fifteen. It took place outside, in a marquee next to the restaurant. The trainees cooked at a set of makeshift work stations and also did the waiting. The menu they had devised consisted of eight courses; given their relative inexperience, this seemed ambitious. Not surprisingly, the quality of the food was mixed, and a general air of confusion prevailed. This was underlined when, as a thick plume of smoke emerged from the cooking area, it was announced that one of the courses had been cancelled.

Not-for-profit restaurants do not have to be like this. The Hoxton Apprentice, in nearby Hoxton Square, also gives unemployed people the chance to work in the restaurant trade. Like Fifteen, it is backed by a celebrity - Prue Leith, who has designed its menu. But unlike Fifteen, the Hoxton Apprentice is aware of its limitations. The food is simple and cheap. There is no unnecessary hankering after publicity. And the result is a restaurant that manages both to benefit the community and to offer its customers an enjoyable meal.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Also by William Skidelsky

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker