Return to: Home | Politics

Posterity's verdicts

Sam Blake

Published 26 July 2004

''History will be my judge," Tony Blair continues to say of his decision to go to war in Iraq. He is not the first to appeal to this court. Are the precedents good?

"Posterity will judge," said Napoleon as his armies spread across Europe. It did, but not favourably. The Spanish dictator Franco also thought he was "responsible only to God and history". Not much comfort for Blair there, either. Hitler, receiving a prison sentence after the failed Munich Beer Hall putsch of 1923, declared that "history will tear to tatters the verdict of this court". In 1940, it looked as if Hitler was right. But history changed its mind.

Blair may find more comfort in John Adams, one of the architects of the US Declaration of Independence, who called on Americans in 1802 to "Think of your forefathers! Think of posterity!" Or the PM may be inspired by Robert Emmet, who led an Irish rebellion against the English and was convicted of treason in 1803. As he went to the gallows (watch out, Tony!) he said that "posterity must determine" the value of his cause. W B Yeats was to record that "Ireland has placed him foremost among her saints of nationality".

Perhaps Blair's best hope is to follow Winston Churchill. He said: "History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Also by Sam Blake

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker