Return to: Home

Wine - Roger Scruton denounces bottled water as one giant fraud

Roger Scruton

Published 01 December 2003

Bottled water is the greatest fraud in the whole history of food fetishism

Every now and then we winos take a day off from our strenuous duties in order to taste the substance of which we are 90 per cent composed. Instead of relying on our alcohol intake to biodegrade into water, we imbibe the stuff directly. It really is rather good, and I recommend it. However, water is a far from innocent commodity, and before going over the top the aspiring hydrophile needs to take stock of some important facts.

First fact: the world is running out of water. Whole areas are now subject to regular drought, our own aquiferous west wind is weakening, and the art of attracting rain by dancing, as practised by Saul Bellow's Henderson, is dying out. The streams and ponds of Scrutopia dried up this summer, causing us to wonder what it will be like in Iraq when the Euphrates does likewise.

Second fact: as that example shows, water is a serious cause of political tension, and will in due course become a casus belli, as states extract more and more water from rivers of which other states lie downstream. This is the situation between Turkey and Iraq, Israel and Lebanon, Sudan and Egypt, and many more.

Third fact: an even greater environmental catastrophe awaits us on account of the absurd habit of treating water as a luxury product, branded, ponced up and sold to the trivial and the gullible. Admittedly, water should be taken in small doses, for medicinal reasons only. But this does not make it into a luxury. The bottled-water industry is probably the greatest fraud to have been perpetrated in the whole history of food fetishism, and one that depends upon the kind of narcissistic health fad that is among the most unattractive features of Generation X. The water in those bottles is neither better for you nor sweeter-tasting than the water from the tap. And the cost of extracting it, bottling it, transporting it and putting it on sale is a fraction of what you pay.

Fourth fact: the real cost is not what you pay in any case. The real cost of bottled water is externalised by the villains who produce it, in the form of a non-biodegradable plastic bottle, a piece of immortal rubbish that will end up in a ditch or a hedgerow, will clog a river or pollute a lake or, in the best case, take up precious and unrenewable space in a landfill site. The cost of this, when multiplied by the many millions of such bottles sold each day, is not merely unsustainable, but ruthlessly dumped on unborn generations. Given this fact, you are under a positive moral obligation not to drink bottled water, and to lobby the government to force those who sell it to take back their empty bottles and swallow them whole.

Meanwhile, if you must drink from a bottle, drink wine.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

9 comments from readers

john problem
08 January 2009 at 12:27

The problem with wine is that if you can't afford the really good stuff, the rest is pretty bad. Especially the French who seem to be having a tsunami of marketing with n million new chateaux popping up every year, another 'cote' discovered almost monthly, and worse, if one does find a wine one likes, it's disappeared from the shelves when you go looking for it. Still, it's better than water which is only fit for washing one's socks in.

Camus
09 January 2009 at 09:23

the water owners - Nestlé, RWE, etc. are making bilions out of the niaive people in the western countries who believe that bottled water is safer or healthier than tap water. It's bottle idiocy!

Stuart-Edward
09 January 2009 at 16:08

Water is useful for washing and putting round ships.

FreedomLand
09 January 2009 at 16:29

Roger Scruton: "The water in those bottles is neither better for you nor sweeter-tasting than the water from the tap...."

Well, the tap-water wherevere you are must be really good, eh? But you resort to a whole lot of garbage and distortions to make your point, whatver that was. At least one good thing to come out of all this was that more people carry a water bottle - and thus drink healthy water instead of sweetened soft drinks or alcohol, uhh.

Now, what about all those wasteful glass wine bottles contaminating the countryside and using up scare resources? You are a prize idiot, NOT a philosoper, Roger Scruton.

demonax
09 January 2009 at 20:29

The Paris tap water comes partially from the Seine. It

feels like Roger could have p------d in it, sometimes . He

may drink it with pleasure I could not.

taghioff.info
10 January 2009 at 04:43

One perhaps needs to ask "Why the aversion to tap water?"

It is not the taste, nor the health issues (there are no major problems with either, if you let the chlorine evaporate off that is).

Perhaps it is simply that it does not cost enough, it is common, a word in English that denotes both shared, and of a low social status.

Class in a glass?

FreedomLand
10 January 2009 at 11:24

Poor #taghioff.info, tap water contains carbonates (calcium and magnesium, etc) which are filtered by your kidneys. Then there are a range of other things like heavy metals, cryptospiridium, copper or iron from pipes, etc etc.

Filtered water, mineral water or bottled water depending where they come from and what is done to them can only be better. Then again, Roger Scruton prefers to use his brain to filter alcohol instead of thinking with it, duh.

andrestierrradelfuego
28 January 2009 at 10:39

Freedomland should do a little research about bottled water and mains water before spouting such drivel. You obviously know nothing about water processing or you would understand that all water, whether it is your precious Evian [which backwards spells naive] Vittel etc contains trace elements and other chemicals. Ask a chemist whether you can have chemical-free water and they will look at you as if you are a lunatic. What are Hydrogen and Oxygen?

Ever heard of Dasani? Sold in bottles, abstracted from the water mains in Sidcup.

Or what about Perrier and its Benzene problem?

Not to mention all your plastics contaminating OUR planet and that of your children? Perhaps you are a misanthrope?

By all means buy bottles for yourself, but do not peddle lies about your disgusting habits to the world in general.

matt12345
04 February 2009 at 13:32

Well what a lot of ill informed claptrap there appears to be here.

"The real cost of bottled water is externalised by the villains who produce it,"

Absolute Nonsense. Bottled water is one of the most competitive markets. Hundereds upon hundereds of different producers in the UK with many more importing to this country. The price of a standars 500ml PET bottle to a retailer will be around £0.20. Yet they will sell it to you for up to £1.00. The retailers are making more profit on water than on any other soft drink. Restaurants are even worse for it. From my time in the industry I have known restaurants who sell bottled water with a 600% or 700% mark up. Even more of a con than wine!

The producers are not to blame. They are supplyiong the demand and in most cases doing their best to diminish the environmental impact.

You suggest the plastic bottles used are not recycleable. This is simply not true. All PET plastic bottles are fully recylcable and, when disposed of by a sane human being, will not be clogging a river up for 10 million years or killing kittens or any of the other absurd claims you make.

It is totally ridiculous for you to be demonising bottled water when at the same time claiming alchohol for pregnant women is less dangerious than watching tv. http://www.newstatesman.com/drink/2008/10/american-wine-bott...

When on the move bottled water provides consumers with a healthy alternative to the sugar and chemical filled soft drinks and the liver failure causing alchohol.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Roger Scruton

Roger Scruton is a philosopher and countryside campaigner as well as an author and broadcaster. Widely regarded as one of Britain’s leading right wing thinkers, his publications include the Meaning of Conservatism. He has also written on fox hunting.

Also by Roger Scruton

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker