Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

What's eating Mike Tyson?

Peter Tatchell

Published 10 June 2002

Observations on homophobia

Is Mike Tyson gay? Are his violent, macho outbursts and homophobic taunts desperate, perverse attempts to compensate for insecurities about his own manhood and sexuality?

Last Sunday, I confronted Tyson about these abusive displays as he arrived at his Memphis gym.

"I've got nothing against gay people," he responded. And, when pressed, he faced the cameras and declared: "I oppose all discrimination against gay people, OK."

He then shook my hand and, in a gesture of reconciliation, hugged my fellow protester Jim Maynard, from the gay rights lobby Equality Tennessee.

As Tyson prepared to challenge Lennox Lewis for the world heavyweight crown in Memphis, questions were being asked about his frequent homophobic behaviour. While shooting for his bit part in the film Black and White, Tyson nearly choked the actor Robert Downey Jr to death when he made a pass at him as part of the film's gay sub-plot. "Why do I get this white fag stuff?" he screamed.

In January, after he bit Lennox Lewis on the leg at their press conference in New York, Tyson clutched his genitals obscenely and poured out a stream of homophobic threats: "I'll fuck you in the arse, you fucking faggot. I'll fuck you in the arse till you love me, you faggot."

Although this abuse was directed at a male reporter, these anti-gay insults took place immediately after the punch-up and fuelled the homophobic atmosphere that has since circulated around Lewis.

While there is no evidence that Tyson is gay, he certainly acts like a repressed, self-loathing, misogynistic gay man. Despite his macho pretensions, he can be effeminate in his speech and mannerisms. His lisp fits the gay stereotype, and he would not look out of place in a gay bar. If I saw him in the street, I would assume he was gay. His favourite insults are violent, graphic threats to sodomise men, revealing a perverse preoccupation with anal sex.

These male rape menaces are not that dissimilar in intent from his actual rape of women. His abusive relationships with women, all about conquest and domination, are a further indication of a misogynistic, self-hating homosexual. Always trying to prove his masculinity, he fits the classic pattern of a gay man who cannot accept his sexual orientation and who uses women sexually as a way of convincing himself - and others - that he is straight.

There have been allegations by other boxers, including Mitchell Rose and Mitch "Blood" Green, that Tyson is gay. More damningly, a recent Tyson outburst in a Guardian interview, in which he blamed his dysfunctional behaviour on the pressures of being in the media spotlight since he was 13, has been interpreted by some as an unwitting self-outing: "If I put a camera on your face for 20 years, I bet you might be homosexual."

Was he inadvertently implying that this pressure had made him gay? And, by implication, that internal angst about his sexuality had driven him to violent rages? Professor Henry E Adams of the University of Georgia has shown that 80 per cent of homophobic men have secret, suppressed homosexual desires.

These findings concur with theories that hostility to gay people is a form of subconscious distorted homosexuality, indicating a fear and loathing of one's inner, suppressed homoerotic attractions. Homophobia can also be a ploy to deflect rumours and suspicions.

Could these, perhaps, be explanations for Mike Tyson's aggressive behaviour?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

martinm
04 March 2008 at 14:23

wow. this is interesting.

malcolm kennedy
21 April 2008 at 10:01

lol..i think u lookin as in depth inta this as u obviously did ,means ur gay....would a guy really go threw raping girls goin ta jail and puttin 100% effort inta gettin girls JUST ta hide hes gay?..lol.....go play in traffic er somethin...

ikotubo
23 September 2008 at 21:19

Mr Thatchell has previously made similar observations about Robert Mugabe. While I'm sure the Zimbabwean tyrant, and indeed, Mike Tyson, are perfectly capable of speaking for themselves and about their sexuality, I'm uncomfortable with Mr Thatchell's apparent supposition that his sexual preferences are something that everyone enjoys. Surely, he must understand that just as he presumably has no interest whatsoever in heterosexual sex, there are people out there who have no interest in homosexuality.

We could easily solve quite a few problems on this planet, I believe, if people could just get on with their own lives without trying to impose their values on others.

Gile
24 September 2008 at 05:17

Hahahahh this is terrible, you people are nuts... leave the guy alone, he is a regular person, he grew up in a bad neighborhood and spend the best age of his life practicing and working his ass off and was not able to enjoy the life to the fullest because of that.He was married couple of times, he was seen with soooo many women in public and there is no doupt in my mind he is gay, even hid former driver was telling the story how he slept with Naomi Campbell as soon as she got in his limo... people,just stop being jealous of him and let him live his life... maybe the author is gay since he is so interested in Mike Tyson's sexualit...who knows...terrible

ikotubo
24 September 2008 at 09:46

I genuinely do wish to be enlightened here about sexual politics: Why is it necessary at all? Surely, if we all kept our sexual antics within the confines of our bedrooms (where I believe they rightly belong), there would be no excuse for anyone to discriminate on grounds of sexuality - of any category, that is.

In a world where armed conflict and atrocious violence are becoming "normal," where an entire mass of humanity has no access to food, healthcare, shelter, water or basic sanitation, where people are losing their jobs and homes due to unfettered global capitalism, is it really so important to focus on whom we sleep with ,or indeed, how?

Carl Jones
24 September 2008 at 11:23

Peter, Its a real shame that you need to toy with individuals using them as a vehicle for your own peverse agenda.

""If"" Mr Tyson is struggling with his sexuallity, then you are clearly an abuser, YOU are abusing people and in this case, someone who is ill equiped to deal their alledged problem[s]..

Peter, have you ever wondered why sooo many great military leaders were gay, or swung both ways? Did you ever consider the possibility that these military leaders got a buzz sending young men to their death?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker